2010
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1006221
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety of Recombinant Activated Factor VII in Randomized Clinical Trials

Abstract: In a large and comprehensive cohort of persons in placebo-controlled trials of rFVIIa, treatment with high doses of rFVIIa on an off-label basis significantly increased the risk of arterial but not venous thromboembolic events, especially among the elderly. (Funded by Novo Nordisk.).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
345
1
20

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 626 publications
(378 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
12
345
1
20
Order By: Relevance
“…55 Unfortunately, the majority of trials have thus far been underpowered to clarify the true risks. Furthermore, the underlying causes of TAEs when rFVIIa has been used off-label remain unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…55 Unfortunately, the majority of trials have thus far been underpowered to clarify the true risks. Furthermore, the underlying causes of TAEs when rFVIIa has been used off-label remain unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…46 Particularly, recent meta-analyses of clinical trials have questioned the efficacy of offlabel recombinant activated factor VII in reducing bleeding 49 and concluded that the off-label use at high doses increases the risk of thromboembolic events. 50 Another systemic approach to minimize blood loss is avoiding hypothermia (if not otherwise indicated), as hypothermia can adversely affect platelet function and result in increased blood loss. 17 Even mild perioperative hypothermia has been reported to be associated with increased blood loss and risk of transfusion.…”
Section: Intraoperative Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from 35 randomized clinical trials of off-label indications for rFVIIa versus placebo (26 studies involving patients and nine studies involving healthy volunteers) were analysed to determine the frequency of thromboembolic events [3]. Most of the clinical trials were Novo Nordisk-sponsored studies (29 vs. 6 investigator-initiated trials).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%