2019
DOI: 10.1136/svn-2018-000192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety of tirofiban and dual antiplatelet therapy in treating intracranial aneurysms

Abstract: BackgroundEndovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms usually involves stent-assisted coiling (SAC) and flow diverters. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors such as tirofiban and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) are required to prevent thromboembolic complications afterwards. We sought to determine the safety of tirofiban and DAPT in these cases.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of our database for patients with intracranial aneurysms who underwent SAC or flow diversion. The tirofiban-DAPT protocol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a devastating stroke with high mortality and morbidity rate (1). As two large clinical trials showed that endovascular coiling could lead to longer disability-free survival and fewer worse outcome compared with neurosurgical clipping in treating ruptured intracranial aneurysms (2,3), endovascular management of aSAH has been the first-line therapy in many clinical centers (4); however, despite its advantage over surgical clipping, endovascular coiling therapy still has an inherent risk of poor clinical outcomes due to the sudden onset of severe complications (5,6). To reduce complications and improve aSAH recovery, clinical variables, such as premorbid history, radiological examination, and laboratory tests, collected at the first admission to medical centers were widely reported to be able to predict outcome following endovascular treatment, guiding the neuro interventionalists to provide essential medical supports to inpatients (7,8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a devastating stroke with high mortality and morbidity rate (1). As two large clinical trials showed that endovascular coiling could lead to longer disability-free survival and fewer worse outcome compared with neurosurgical clipping in treating ruptured intracranial aneurysms (2,3), endovascular management of aSAH has been the first-line therapy in many clinical centers (4); however, despite its advantage over surgical clipping, endovascular coiling therapy still has an inherent risk of poor clinical outcomes due to the sudden onset of severe complications (5,6). To reduce complications and improve aSAH recovery, clinical variables, such as premorbid history, radiological examination, and laboratory tests, collected at the first admission to medical centers were widely reported to be able to predict outcome following endovascular treatment, guiding the neuro interventionalists to provide essential medical supports to inpatients (7,8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consensus recommendations for the dosage of GPIIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors are highly potent antiplatelet inhibitors and have significant platelet dissolution effects, 26 which may be advantageous during acute ischemic stroke treatment, but a theoretical concern exists for use during aneurysm repair as clot dissolution may cause re‐bleeding. Currently, the literature is evolving to support the use of tirofiban during aneurysm repair with promising outcomes 27–29 . Recently, cangrelor was directly compared to tirofiban in PCI and tirofiban was shown to be superior in terms of antiplatelet activity, but these results remain controversial 30,31 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%