2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-5063-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety profile of trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy in clinical practice: results of the German compassionate-use program for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Abstract: BackgroundTrifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102, Lonsurf®), a novel oral anti-tumor agent combining an anti-neoplastic thymidine-based nucleoside analogue (trifluridine, FTD) with a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor (tipiracil hydrochloride, TPI) presents a new treatment option for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients refractory or intolerant to standard therapies. FTD/TPI was approved in the European Union (EU) in April 2016 and launched on the German market in August 15, 2016.MethodsWe investigated the cha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
10
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for these differences are unclear but may reflect differing clinical practice in the evaluation and recording of ECOG-PS scores in different countries, or may suggest that patients included in the German and UK NPPs were at a more advanced stage of disease at enrolment. The number and type of previous treatments observed were similar to those reported in observational studies from the Netherlands [14], Japan [15], Latvia [16] and Germany [17]. However, a smaller proportion of the patients receiving trifluridine/tipiracil in this analysis had at least 4 prior treatment regimens (19%) than in the RE-COURSE trial [10] (60%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The reasons for these differences are unclear but may reflect differing clinical practice in the evaluation and recording of ECOG-PS scores in different countries, or may suggest that patients included in the German and UK NPPs were at a more advanced stage of disease at enrolment. The number and type of previous treatments observed were similar to those reported in observational studies from the Netherlands [14], Japan [15], Latvia [16] and Germany [17]. However, a smaller proportion of the patients receiving trifluridine/tipiracil in this analysis had at least 4 prior treatment regimens (19%) than in the RE-COURSE trial [10] (60%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, there was a higher proportion of patients in the RECOURSE trial [10] and the Italian single-centre compassionate use programme (CUP) [13] with ECOG-PS scores of 0 (56 and 63% respectively) than patients enrolled in the UK NPP (28% of patients receiving ≥1 dose of trifluridine/tipiracil, 14% of patients not receiving trifluridine/tipiracil). The patients enrolled in the UK NPP were more similar to the sample reported in the German CUP, in which 28% of patients had ECOG scores of 0 [17]. The reasons for these differences are unclear but may reflect differing clinical practice in the evaluation and recording of ECOG-PS scores in different countries, or may suggest that patients included in the German and UK NPPs were at a more advanced stage of disease at enrolment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several compassionate use programs of FTD/TPI across Europe, the USA, and Asia have been conducted and in summary they underline the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI in a real-world population with refractory mCRC [17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Studies Favoring Ftd/tpi Treatment For Mcrc Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%