“…Several studies demonstrated that transfemoral BAP could improve functions and health-related quality of life, particularly for young and active individuals experiencing overwhelming socket issues (Atallah et al, 2020;Hagberg and Branemark, 2009;Hebert et al, 2017;Hoyt et al, 2020;Leijendekkers et al, 2017;van Eck and McGough, 2015). Management of residual soft tissues as well as risks of infections, loosening, periprosthetic fracture and breakage of osseointegrated implant parts are deemed acceptable by treating teams, although they are yet to be satisfactorily resolved (Atallah et al, 2018;Atallah et al, 2020;Hoyt et al, 2020;Kunutsor et al, 2018;van Eck and McGough, 2015). Preliminary health economic analyses suggested the cost-effectiveness of BAP compared to socket prostheses from a governmental prosthetic care perspective (Frossard et al, 2017;Frossard et al, 2018a;Frossard et al, 2018b;Frossard et al, 2019a).…”