2023
DOI: 10.3390/buildings13102540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety Risk Evaluation of Metro Shield Construction When Undercrossing a Bridge

Kuang He,
Jun Zhu,
Hui Wang
et al.

Abstract: The government of China has planned numerous metro projects, and with more metros, undercrossing of bridges can hardly be avoided. Metro shield construction when undercrossing a bridge (MSCUB) frequently takes place in complicated natural and social contexts, which often makes the construction process more susceptible to safety accidents. Therefore, it is crucial to look into the safety risk during MSCUB. This paper identified the safety risk factors during MSCUB by using a literature review and expert group e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ji et al [10] used WBS-RBS to establish an evaluation index system and introduced the Delphi method to improve FAHP to assess the construction safety risk of large and complex bridges. He et al [11] introduced the validation factor analysis into the fuzzy theory, proposed a new bridge risk assessment model, and applied it to a real project to verify the validity of the model. The research methodology of the relevant literature is summarized using Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ji et al [10] used WBS-RBS to establish an evaluation index system and introduced the Delphi method to improve FAHP to assess the construction safety risk of large and complex bridges. He et al [11] introduced the validation factor analysis into the fuzzy theory, proposed a new bridge risk assessment model, and applied it to a real project to verify the validity of the model. The research methodology of the relevant literature is summarized using Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%