2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety, surveillance and policing in the night-time economy: (Re)turning to numbers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Offenders may overestimate the capacity of the camera scheme and a “diffusion of benefits” (Clarke & Weisburd, 1994; Guerette & Bowers, 2009) may spread to areas beyond the effective visible range of the camera. Although often evaluated alongside other measures (Brands, Aalst, & Schwanen, 2015), CCTV cameras might also increase the detection rate, improve the police response by allowing camera operators to coordinate the appropriate reaction to an incident, encourage victims to take more security precautions, increase usage of public places, and encourage community pride and informal social control (Ashby, 2017; Gerell, 2016; LaVigne et al, 2011; Piza et al, 2015). CCTV may therefore be about changing the perception of the public and social space under surveillance rather than a specific mechanism of physical crime prevention (Zurawski, 2010).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Offenders may overestimate the capacity of the camera scheme and a “diffusion of benefits” (Clarke & Weisburd, 1994; Guerette & Bowers, 2009) may spread to areas beyond the effective visible range of the camera. Although often evaluated alongside other measures (Brands, Aalst, & Schwanen, 2015), CCTV cameras might also increase the detection rate, improve the police response by allowing camera operators to coordinate the appropriate reaction to an incident, encourage victims to take more security precautions, increase usage of public places, and encourage community pride and informal social control (Ashby, 2017; Gerell, 2016; LaVigne et al, 2011; Piza et al, 2015). CCTV may therefore be about changing the perception of the public and social space under surveillance rather than a specific mechanism of physical crime prevention (Zurawski, 2010).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the increased accessibility of public venues in the model resulted in OU residents spending more time in the IC, leading to the displacement of some incidents of verbal aggression from OU private to IC public venues: the number of verbal aggression incidents among OU residents inside public venues increased by 34%, and decreased in private venues by 25%. Further, this coincided with a 70% increase in the number of OU residents being ejected from public venues for being intoxicated (the model does not include being ejected for other reasons (Brands, van Aalst, & Schwanen, 2015)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For Melbourne, the model suggested that an enabling policy such as 24-hour PT-or even a two-hour extension in PT operations-may be more beneficial than a restrictive policy such as 1am venue lockouts, and even more beneficial than a policy of 3am lockouts. Such policies have a far greater chance of success, and face fewer cultural and political barriers in their implementation (Brands, et al, 2015;Lam, et al, 2015;Waitt, Jessop, & Gorman-Murray, 2011). The model has thus provided a demonstration that alternatives to tried policies, which might be more in line with the preferences and understandings of safety held by night-time economy patrons themselves, can be equally successful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2. For a thorough discussion on surveillance, technology and safety in night-time public spaces, see Brands (2014). 438 L. de Wijs et al…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%