AimsTo assess the potential interaction between noncardiac comorbidities (NCCs) and the efficacy and safety of high intensity care (HIC) versus usual care (UC) in STRONG‐HF trial, including stable patients with improved but still elevated NPsMethods and ResultsIn the trial, 8 NCCs were reported: anemia, diabetes, renal dysfunction, severe liver disease, COPD/asthma, stroke/TIA, psychiatric/neurological disorders, and malignancies. Patients were classified by NCC number (0, 1, 2 and ≥3). The treatment effect of HIC versus UC on the primary endpoint, 180‐day death or HF‐rehospitalization, was compared by NCC number and by each individual comorbidity.Among the 1078 patients, the prevalence of 0, 1, 2 and ≥3 NCCs was 24.3%, 39.8%, 24.5% and 11.3%. Achievement of full doses of HF‐therapies at 90‐ and 180‐days in the HIC was similar irrespective of NCCs number.In the HIC, the primary endpoint occurred in 10.0%, 16,6%, 13,6% and 26,2%, in those with 0, 1, 2 and ≥3 NCCs, as compared to 19,1%, 25,4%, 23,3% and 26,2% in UC (interaction‐p=0.80). The treatment benefit of HIC vs. UC on the primary endpoint didn't differ significantly by each individual comorbidity. There was no significant treatment interaction by NCC number in quality‐of‐life improvement (p=0.98) or the incidence of serious adverse events (p=0.11).ConclusionsIn the STRONG‐HF trial, non‐cardiac comorbidities neither limited the rapid up‐titration of HF‐therapies, nor attenuated the benefit of HIC on primary endpoint. In the context of a clinical trial, the benefit‐risk ratio favors the rapid up‐titration of HF‐therapies even in patients with multiple NCCsThis article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.