2020 6th International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics (ICCAR) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/iccar49639.2020.9108037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety vs. Efficiency: AI-Based Risk Mitigation in Collaborative Robotics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a start, we consider the safety system as a five-step risk management process based on [16,33] and modified for handling run-time applications using different risk policies, as shown in Figure 2. This figure summarizes the approach followed in the present research, highlighting the importance and advantages of mapping the potential risks into the design step.…”
Section: Risk Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a start, we consider the safety system as a five-step risk management process based on [16,33] and modified for handling run-time applications using different risk policies, as shown in Figure 2. This figure summarizes the approach followed in the present research, highlighting the importance and advantages of mapping the potential risks into the design step.…”
Section: Risk Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the current work is now focusing on deploying AI into ensuring a highly secure robotic environment with the high accuracy and less overhead. Terra et al presented the implementation of Fuzzy Logic System (FLS) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) to build risk mitigation modules for human-robot collaboration scenarios [324]. The testing results revealed that the presented risk mitigation strategies improve the safety aspect and the efficiency by 26% from the default setup.…”
Section: Artificial Intelligence-based Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 6: The risk profile R Im ε,C (blue circle), assuming failures occur at pairs (23,24,25,26,27). The red dash represents the basic risk of collision R C,j ε as in [19].…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk analysis in robotic applications can be traced from when [11] built the algorithmic risk measure for surgical robots to when [24] showed how the involvement of riskmitigation in robot operations could increase safety. A more systemic and analytical approach that adopts the widely used financial tool value-at-risk and the conditional-value-at-risk measure [16] has been proposed by both [13] and [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%