Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu Öğrencilerinin Sağlıklı Yaşam Biçimi Davranışları ve Etkileyen Faktörler

Şen, Mehmet Ali; Ceylan, Ali; Kurt, Mehmet Emin; Palanci, Yılmaz; Adin, Cihan

doi:10.5798/dicletip.298567

Cited by 34 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A study by Kostak et al 29 conducted with 474 university students found that the mean HLBS-II was 126.55±18.76 while a study by Yılmazel et al 30 found it to be 121.57±19.65 in nursing students. In a study conducted by Sen et al with 251 university students, the mean score of HLBS-II was found 118.0 ± 21.0 31 . According to previous studies, there were many 803 studies conducted in this area and similar results were obtained [32][33][34][35] .…”

Section: Table 4 the Comparison Of Hlbs-ii Scores Of The Interventiomentioning

confidence: 91%

The impact of education given to obese and preobese university students according to the health promotion model on nutrition and physical activities

Sonkaya

Günay²

2020

Cukurova Medical Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Öz Purpose: This investigation was conducted in order to evaluate the impact of education given to university students according to the Health Promotion Model (HPM) on their practices about nutrition and physical activity. Materials and Methods: This interventional study was conducted in Amasya University in the 2017-2018 educational year. Intervention and a control groups were formed from the students having a body mass index (BMI) 25 and over. A sociodemographic questionnaire, Healthy Lifestyle Behaviours Scale-II (HLBS-II), and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) were administered to the students and height and weight measures were taken. The students in the intervention group were given education on healthy lifestyle behaviours in accordance with the HPM. Results:. In the intervention and control groups, significant increases were found in the HLBS sub-scale scores after education. The increase in the intervention group was significantly higher than the control group. The increase in the IPAQ total score and walking subdimension score was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group. Conclusion: Education according to the HPM significantly improved the behaviours of students related to health responsibility, nutrition, and physical activity. Amaç. Bu araştırma üniversite öğrencilerine Sağlığı Geliştirme Modeline göre verilen eğitimin, öğrencilerin beslenme ve fiziksel aktivite ile ilgili bilgi, tutum ve danranışlarına etkisini değerlendirmek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu müdahale araştırması Amasya Üniversitesinde 2017-2018 eğtim-öğretim yılında yapıldı. Beden kitle indeksi (BKİ) değeri 25 ve üzerinde olan 134 öğrenci müdahale grubuna, 132 öğrenci kontrol grubuna alındı. Öğrencilere sosyodemografik anket formu, Sağlıklı Yaşam Biçimi Davranışları Ölçeği (SYBDÖ) ve Uluslararası Fiziksel Aktivite Anketi (UFAA) uygulandı. Müdahale grubundaki öğrencilere, Sağlığı Geliştirme Modeline uygun olarak, sağlıklı yaşam biçimi davranışları ile ilgili eğitim verildi. Eğitimden üç ay sonra aynı anket ve ölçekler yeniden uygulandı Bulgular: Müdahale ve kontrol gruplarında eğitimden sonra SYBDÖ alt boyut puanlarının çoğunda önemli ölçüde artış saptandı. SYBDÖ Toplam puanı ile Sağlık Sorumluluğu ve Beslenme ve alt boyutlarında müdahale grubundaki artış kontrol grubuna göre önemli ölçüde yüksek bulundu. Eğitim sonrasında, UFAA Toplam skoru ve Yürüme alt boyutu skorundaki artış müdahale grunbunda kontrol grubuna göre önemli ölçüde yüksek bulundu.. Sonuç: Üniversite öğrencilerine Sağlığı Geliştirme Modeline göre verilen eğim, öğrencilerin özellikle sağlık sorumluluğu, beslenme ve fiziksel aktivite ile ilgili tutum ve davranışlarında önemli ölçüde iyileşme sağlamıştır.

show abstract

Section: Table 4 the Comparison Of Hlbs-ii Scores Of The Interventiomentioning

confidence: 91%

The impact of education given to obese and preobese university students according to the health promotion model on nutrition and physical activities

Sonkaya

Günay²

2020

Cukurova Medical Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nutrition, interpersonal relations and total mean score of the students with high educated mothers were significant (p<0.05). [14] In the descriptive and cross-sectional study with the aim of determining how healthy the living of 320 students are, the survey form prepared by researchers Health-Promoting Living Profile (HPLP; Walker, Sechrist & Pender, 1987) The Measurement of Coping With Stress (WCCL; Aysan, 1988Aysan, , 1994 and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; Hisli, 1988; Şahin, 1989; Teğin, 1980) were applied. As a result of the research, it was determined that students did not have sufficient knowledge to maintain a healthy living, did not use effective methods to cope with stress, and 40% of them were depressed.…”

Section: Investigations On Healthy Living Behaviors and Related Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Healthy Living Behaviors In University Students And Related Factors

Gayef¹

2019

Anatol JFM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

METHODIn this review, detailed literature search was conducted at Google Academic with the keywords of "health, life, wellness, behavior, student, university". This study focuses on the results Today, health is considered to be a biopsychosocial, that is to say, a complete good of individuals, which also means an increase in quality of life and satisfaction. Healthy living behavior is the control of all behaviors that are applied to protect against diseases affecting individual health and the individual choosing behaviors that are appropriate to his/her health conditions in regulating daily activities. In this review, it is aimed to present healthy living behavior, importance of healthy living behavior, research results on healthy living behavior and related factors and make suggestions about healthy living behavior. ABSTRACT Albena Gayef

show abstract

“…İnsanları hastalıktan korumak, yaşamlarını sağlıklı olarak sürdürebilme uygulamalarının tümü sağlıklı yaşam biçimi olarak tanımlanmaktadır (Gül ve Şahin, 2019). Sağlıklı yaşam biçimi kişilerin; beslenme alışkanlıkları, sağlık sorumluluğu, egzersiz, kendini gerçekleştirme, kişilerarası destek ve stres yönetimine karşılık yapılan değerlendirmelerinin tümünü içermektedir (Cihangiroğlu ve Deveci, 2011;Kılıç ve Balta, 2019;Tambağ, 2011). Sağlıklı yaşam biçimi kişilerin yalnızca hastalıklardan korumanın yanı sıra hayatı süresince fiziksel uygunluk düzeyini geliştiren davranışları içermelidir.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

“…Bu davranışlar kişinin fiziksel uygunluk düzeyini geliştirmenin yanı sıra kendinin fiziksel yönden olumlu yönde geliştirmeyi içermektedir. Dengeli beslenme, yeterli ve düzenli aktivite, sağlığa zararlı maddelerden kaçınma, sağlık sorumluluğu ve stresle başa çıkma davranışları kişi ve toplumların sağlığının olumlu yönde geliştirilmesini etkileyen davranışlardır (Vural ve Bakır, 2015;Beydağ vd., 2014;Altay ve ark., 2015).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Sağlıkla İlişkili Bölümlerde Okuyan Öğrencilerin Sağlıklı Yaşam Biçimi Davranışlarının Bazı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi

Akbulut¹

2020

TurkishStudies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nowadays, one of the important component of living a quality and healthy life is the lifestyle. Education can also affect the lifestyle. The purpose of present study was to investigate the healthy lifestyle behaviors of students who are studying in different departments related to health. The research group consisted of students studying in health-related departments of Firat University. The sample of the present research consisted of 480 volunteer participants enrolled in different departments of sports sciences (240) and health sciences (240). Personal information form was used for the demographic characteristics of the participants. To determine healthy lifestyle behaviors, ''Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors Scale-II'' was used developed by Walker et al. (1996) and adapted into Turkish by Bahar et al. (2008). SPSS software was used in the analysis of the data obtained and the significance level was determined as p <0.05. Percentage, frequency and standard deviation were used as descriptive statistics. Independent samples t test was used for comparison of two groups and One Way Anova test was used for comparison of multiple groups. According to the analysis results; according to the question do you have a healthy lifestyle, there were significant differences between the groups in the sub-dimensions of healthy lifestyle behaviors (p<0.05). However, it was found that there was no difference between the groups according to their financial status and participation in social activity (p>0.05). In conclusion; health responsibility, physical activity and spiritual development sub-dimensions were found to be higher in favor of males. However, it can be said that participation in social activity and financial situation do not affect healthy lifestyle behaviors.

show abstract

Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu Öğrencilerinin Sağlıklı Yaşam Biçimi Davranışları ve Etkileyen Faktörler

Cited by 34 publications

References 7 publications

The impact of education given to obese and preobese university students according to the health promotion model on nutrition and physical activities

The impact of education given to obese and preobese university students according to the health promotion model on nutrition and physical activities

Healthy Living Behaviors In University Students And Related Factors

Sağlıkla İlişkili Bölümlerde Okuyan Öğrencilerin Sağlıklı Yaşam Biçimi Davranışlarının Bazı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About