2017
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erx031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salicylic acid interferes with GFP fluorescence in vivo

Abstract: HighlightSalicylic acid (SA) interferes with fluorescence from GFP‐derived reporter constructs in planta and as such assays using these constructs with SA treatment should be evaluated cautiously.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, full-length CAMTA3 protein was detected in nuclei isolated from cold-treated plants and was at greater levels in these plants than it was in plants grown at warm temperature ( Figure 4E; a second band, marked with asterisk, was detected in the nuclear preparations, but not in the total protein preparations, indicating that it resulted from proteolytic cleavage of CAMTA3 during isolation of the nuclei). The small apparent discrepancy between the relative amounts of CAMTA3 protein in the nuclei of warm-and cold-treated plants observed in the fluorescence and immunoblotting assays was likely due to the interfering effects that SA has been reported to have on the fluorescence of GFP protein fusions in vivo (de Jonge et al, 2017). Taken together, our results indicated that the induction of SA pathway genes in cold-treated plants involved changes in the ability of the CAMTA3 protein to repress gene expression.…”
Section: Induction Of Sa Pathway Genes In Response To Low Temperaturementioning
confidence: 55%
“…In addition, full-length CAMTA3 protein was detected in nuclei isolated from cold-treated plants and was at greater levels in these plants than it was in plants grown at warm temperature ( Figure 4E; a second band, marked with asterisk, was detected in the nuclear preparations, but not in the total protein preparations, indicating that it resulted from proteolytic cleavage of CAMTA3 during isolation of the nuclei). The small apparent discrepancy between the relative amounts of CAMTA3 protein in the nuclei of warm-and cold-treated plants observed in the fluorescence and immunoblotting assays was likely due to the interfering effects that SA has been reported to have on the fluorescence of GFP protein fusions in vivo (de Jonge et al, 2017). Taken together, our results indicated that the induction of SA pathway genes in cold-treated plants involved changes in the ability of the CAMTA3 protein to repress gene expression.…”
Section: Induction Of Sa Pathway Genes In Response To Low Temperaturementioning
confidence: 55%
“…A DR5 signal depletion was detected in Arabidopsis roots upon 100-200 mM SA (Wang et al, 2007), but Zhao et al (2015) also reported a decrease in DR5 expression in the root tip upon 30 mM SA treatment. Even though 50-200 mM SA treatment inhibits GFP fluorescence (de Jonge et al, 2017), we consistently observe an increase in DR5::GFP fluorescence after 30 mM SA treatment. The results of de Jonge et al (2017) showed that the GFP in protein fusions, but not purified GFP, is affected by SA.…”
Section: Sa Modifies Auxin Distribution In the Root Tipmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Even though 50-200 mM SA treatment inhibits GFP fluorescence (de Jonge et al, 2017), we consistently observe an increase in DR5::GFP fluorescence after 30 mM SA treatment. The results of de Jonge et al (2017) showed that the GFP in protein fusions, but not purified GFP, is affected by SA. However, the fact that DR5::GFP codes for free GFP does not explain this inconsistency, as we observe that TAA1:TAA1-GFP, a protein fusion, also shows an increase after SA treatment.…”
Section: Sa Modifies Auxin Distribution In the Root Tipmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Factors causing this may include the amount of protein, 3 the pH associated with a proteinspecific localization 4,5 or interactions with other cellular components that destabilizes the fluorophore. 6 In addition, adding an endogenous protein tag of 25 to 80 KDa to a protein may generate dominant interactive effects that can interfere with protein activity and potentially affect the interpretation of the observed localization. 7,8 Here we use the recent localization of DEK1 (Defective kernel 1) in the moss Physcomitrella patens 9 to illustrate some of the pitfalls described above.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%