2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-015-2579-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salinization decreases population densities of the freshwater crustacean, Daphnia dentifera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
39
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
39
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ubiquitous among freshwater ecosystems, Ceriodaphnia dubia exhibits an IC 25 valuethe inhibition concentration that causes a 25% reduction of growth or reproduction-at 1,050 mg Cl − /L(Corsi, Graczyk, Geis, Booth, & Richards, 2010). found that experimental Daphnia dentifera population densities were reduced by almost 50% at 364 mg Cl − /L, which is similar to the effects observed on large-bodied grazer such as Daphnia in a natural lake contaminated with 217-445 mg Cl − /L(Judd et al, 2005).Laboratory tests that quantify LC 50 values are valuable, but it is likely that even sublethal concentrations can affect zooplankton population abundance Searle et al (2016). found that experimental Daphnia dentifera population densities were reduced by almost 50% at 364 mg Cl − /L, which is similar to the effects observed on large-bodied grazer such as Daphnia in a natural lake contaminated with 217-445 mg Cl − /L(Judd et al, 2005).Laboratory tests that quantify LC 50 values are valuable, but it is likely that even sublethal concentrations can affect zooplankton population abundance Searle et al (2016).…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ubiquitous among freshwater ecosystems, Ceriodaphnia dubia exhibits an IC 25 valuethe inhibition concentration that causes a 25% reduction of growth or reproduction-at 1,050 mg Cl − /L(Corsi, Graczyk, Geis, Booth, & Richards, 2010). found that experimental Daphnia dentifera population densities were reduced by almost 50% at 364 mg Cl − /L, which is similar to the effects observed on large-bodied grazer such as Daphnia in a natural lake contaminated with 217-445 mg Cl − /L(Judd et al, 2005).Laboratory tests that quantify LC 50 values are valuable, but it is likely that even sublethal concentrations can affect zooplankton population abundance Searle et al (2016). found that experimental Daphnia dentifera population densities were reduced by almost 50% at 364 mg Cl − /L, which is similar to the effects observed on large-bodied grazer such as Daphnia in a natural lake contaminated with 217-445 mg Cl − /L(Judd et al, 2005).Laboratory tests that quantify LC 50 values are valuable, but it is likely that even sublethal concentrations can affect zooplankton population abundance Searle et al (2016).…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…Over a period of 21 days, the LC 50 for Daphnia longispina was 1,334 mg Cl − /L(Goncalves et al, 2007). Road salt concentrations of 860 and 1,300 mg Cl − /L can reduce Daphnia pulex abundance by 40 and 79%, respectively(Hintz & Relyea, 2017b) Searle, Shaw, Hunsberger, Prado, and Duffy (2016). Road salt concentrations of 860 and 1,300 mg Cl − /L can reduce Daphnia pulex abundance by 40 and 79%, respectively(Hintz & Relyea, 2017b) Searle, Shaw, Hunsberger, Prado, and Duffy (2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased salinity can also disrupt population dynamics of some zooplankton species (Searle et al . ). Small invertebrates that lack exoskeletons are generally the least tolerant to increases in salinity, and most freshwater macroinvertebrates can only survive for short periods of time (48 h) in water with chloride concentrations around 2000 mg L −1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We predicted that when individuals were exposed to a standard parasite dose (experiment 1), infection prevalence would not be affected by increased salinity because both the host and the parasite would be experiencing physiological stress, reducing both host resistance and parasite infectivity (Canhoto, Simões, Lúcia Gonҫalves, Guilhermino, & Bärlocher, ; Liu & Steiner, ). Additionally, because increasing salinity can decrease the population density of D. dentifera (Searle, Shaw, et al., ) and transmission of the parasite is affected by host density (Searle, Hochstedler, Merrick, Ilmain, & Wigren, ; Searle, Cortez, et al., ), we predicted that increased salinity would reduce parasite transmission and decrease infection prevalence at the population level (experiment 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes to salinity can also alter host–parasite interactions by affecting host populations. For example, increased salinity can decrease the population density of a given species of zooplankton (Hintz & Relyea, ; Searle, Shaw, Hunsberger, Prado, & Duffy, ). When this occurs, the reduced contacts between individuals may also reduce transmission of some parasites (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%