2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.04.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salivary and Dental Complications in Childhood Cancer Survivors Treated With Radiation Therapy to the Head and Neck: A PENTEC Comprehensive Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
1
1

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
35
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Over 75% of childhood cancer survivors (CCS) experience one or more late effects arising from childhood cancer treatment [ 1 ]. Amongst these late effects, survivors may develop salivary gland dysfunction, such as hyposalivation (decreased salivary secretion) and/or xerostomia (the subjective feeling of a dry mouth) [ 2 , 3 , 4 ]. Salivary gland dysfunction is a significant and probably underestimated late effect and may negatively affect general health [ 5 , 6 ], as saliva maintains oral health by protecting the oral mucosa and teeth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over 75% of childhood cancer survivors (CCS) experience one or more late effects arising from childhood cancer treatment [ 1 ]. Amongst these late effects, survivors may develop salivary gland dysfunction, such as hyposalivation (decreased salivary secretion) and/or xerostomia (the subjective feeling of a dry mouth) [ 2 , 3 , 4 ]. Salivary gland dysfunction is a significant and probably underestimated late effect and may negatively affect general health [ 5 , 6 ], as saliva maintains oral health by protecting the oral mucosa and teeth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent systematic review by Milgrom et al presented data on dental developmental effects in CCSs who received RT to the head and neck, focusing on dose–volume parameters [ 20 ]. Risk factors included higher radiation dose to the developing teeth (>20 Gy) and a lower age at treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the outcome was common, and in such situations the odds ratios generated by logistic regression analyses overestimate the relative risk, we used Poisson regression models with log-link function and robust standard errors to calculate relative risks [ 27 ]. Potential risk factors were included in the multivariable model based on univariable analyses, previous studies [ 8 , 19 , 20 ], and clinical relevance, resulting in the variables gender, age at diagnosis, H&N RT, treatment with vinca alkaloids, treatment with epipodophyllotoxins, and the cyclophosphamide equivalent dose (CED) [ 28 ]. Additionally, we evaluated the contribution of other chemotherapy classes (anthracyclines, platinum compounds, and antimetabolites), but those were not included in the final model, as they were not significantly associated with DDDs in univariable analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The risk factors for DDDs include (a) age below 3 y while receiving ACT, (b) dose-dependent alkylating agents including cyclophosphamide (> 4 g/m 2 ), and (c) radiotherapy dose exceeding 20 Gy to head and neck region [3,4]. Few recent studies have suggested age below 4 y and radiotherapy dose exceeding 20 Gy to predict DDDs better than the dose of radiotherapy alone [4,5]. In the current protocols for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), prophylactic cranial radiotherapy is no longer included.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%