2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2010.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salivary chenodeoxycholic acid and its glycine-conjugate: Their determination method using LC–MS/MS and variation of their concentrations with increased saliva flow rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HP and PA rapidly reacted with biologically and/or clinically important carboxylic acids, e.g., chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), glycochenodeoxycholic acid (GCDCA), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), 2-(β-carboxyethyl)-6-hydroxy-2,7,8-trimethylchroman (γ-CEHC), α-lipoic acid, homovanillic acid (HVA) and 5-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid (HIAA), in the presence of 2,2′-dipyridyl disulfide (DPDS) and triphenylphosphine (TPP). 55,56 The resulting HP-and PAderivatives were highly responsive to ESI-MS operating in the positive-ion mode, and gave characteristic product ions during MS/MS, which enabled sensitive detection using selected reaction monitoring (SRM). Among the two reagents, PA has been more suitable for practical use 55 because of the higher sensitivity.…”
Section: Reagents For Amines and Carboxylic Acidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HP and PA rapidly reacted with biologically and/or clinically important carboxylic acids, e.g., chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), glycochenodeoxycholic acid (GCDCA), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), 2-(β-carboxyethyl)-6-hydroxy-2,7,8-trimethylchroman (γ-CEHC), α-lipoic acid, homovanillic acid (HVA) and 5-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid (HIAA), in the presence of 2,2′-dipyridyl disulfide (DPDS) and triphenylphosphine (TPP). 55,56 The resulting HP-and PAderivatives were highly responsive to ESI-MS operating in the positive-ion mode, and gave characteristic product ions during MS/MS, which enabled sensitive detection using selected reaction monitoring (SRM). Among the two reagents, PA has been more suitable for practical use 55 because of the higher sensitivity.…”
Section: Reagents For Amines and Carboxylic Acidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they are sometimes highly polar and too hydrophilic for the separation on the reversed Chenodeoxycholic acid and glycochenodeoxycholic acid (saliva) (53).…”
Section: Aminesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stimulation by these methods usually increases saliva flow by 2-5 times (basal flow rate, 0.5 mL/min versus increased flow rate, 1-3 mL/min). 4) However, some reports show that the stimulated saliva collection decreases the concentrations of some steroids, such as dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), in the saliva 4,16) (see Section 4 for details). Taken together, the collection of unstimulated saliva into a collection tube without a collection device can avoid the above-mentioned pitfalls.…”
Section: Challenge Of Mass Spectrometry Toward the Elucidation Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%