2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-02016-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salivary cystatin S levels in children with early childhood caries in comparison with caries-free children; statistical analysis and machine learning

Abstract: Background Early childhood caries is the most common infectious disease in childhood, with a high prevalence in developing countries. The assessment of the variables that influence early childhood caries as well as its pathophysiology leads to improved control of this disease. Cystatin S, as one of the salivary proteins, has an essential role in pellicle formation, tooth re-mineralization, and protection. The present study aims to assess salivary cystatin S levels and demographic data in early … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AI models developed for application in pedodontics have mainly focused on: dental plaque on primary teeth ( n = 1) [ 21 ], ECC ( n = 6) [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ], fissure sealant categorization ( n = 1) [ 31 ], mesiodens and supernumerary tooth identification ( n = 6) [ 3 , 10 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 41 ], chronological age assessment ( n = 4) [ 32 , 33 , 37 , 38 ], identification of deciduous and young permanent teeth ( n = 3) [ 34 , 35 , 39 ], children’s oral Health ( n = 2) [ 7 , 20 ], and ectopic eruption ( n = 2) [ 39 , 40 ] ( Figure 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…AI models developed for application in pedodontics have mainly focused on: dental plaque on primary teeth ( n = 1) [ 21 ], ECC ( n = 6) [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ], fissure sealant categorization ( n = 1) [ 31 ], mesiodens and supernumerary tooth identification ( n = 6) [ 3 , 10 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 41 ], chronological age assessment ( n = 4) [ 32 , 33 , 37 , 38 ], identification of deciduous and young permanent teeth ( n = 3) [ 34 , 35 , 39 ], children’s oral Health ( n = 2) [ 7 , 20 ], and ectopic eruption ( n = 2) [ 39 , 40 ] ( Figure 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Koopaie, M. et al [ 27 ] used statistical analysis and machine learning approaches to compare the levels of salivary cystatin S and demographic data between ECC patients with caries-free patients. Different types of supervised learning models, including feed-forward neural networks, XGBoost, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machines (SVM), were used in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Utilizing AI algorithms with salivary biomarkers to generate models that can be validated and applied potentially in clinical practice is more common than its use for biomarker discovery (Arias-Bujanda et al, 2020;Banavar et al, 2021;Bostanci et al, 2018;Carnielli et al, 2018;da Costa et al, 2022;de Dumast et al, 2018;Eriksson et al, 2022;Gomez Hernandez et al, 2021;Grier et al, 2021;Kim et al, 2021;Kistenev et al, 2018;Koller et al, 2021;Koopaie et al, 2021;Kouznetsova et al, 2021;Lee et al, 2021;Liu, Tong, et al, 2021;Lyashenko et al, 2020;Monedeiro et al, 2021;Nakano et al, 2014Nakano et al, , 2018Pang et al, 2021;Schulte et al, 2020;Shoukri et al, 2019;Song et al, 2020;Sonis et al, 2013;Tamaki et al, 2009;Winck et al, 2015;Wu et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2021;Zhou et al, 2021;Zlotogorski-Hurvitz et al, 2019) AI-based biomarker platforms constructed during biomarker discovery may be executed for biomarker validation on the premise that each additional saliva sample would be subjected to similar large-scale analysis and used as input for the same models (Adeoye, Wan, et al, 2022). While this may not be cost-effective, feasible, or encourage validation, promising biomarkers selected using conventional statistical approaches or AI-based exploratory analysis (in biomarker discovery) may be used to develop new models for biomarker validation and potential clinical application (Koopaie et al, 2021;Tamaki et al, 2009). In this proce...…”
Section: Ai Models In Salivary Biomarker Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, their AUCs were from 0.71 to 0.93 (Table 2). However, similar to the use of intelligent models for oral cancer, many studies had insufficient sample sizes to meet a minimum event‐per‐variable cutoff of twenty considering the number of predictive salivary biomarkers available for model construction (Grier et al, 2021; Koller et al, 2021; Koopaie et al, 2021; Lyashenko et al, 2020; Wu et al, 2021). These models will also benefit from retraining using larger sample sizes and external validation in the future.…”
Section: Current Applications Of Artificial Intelligence For Salivary...mentioning
confidence: 99%