2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salivary flow and alpha-amylase: Collection technique, duration, and oral fluid type

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
96
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
96
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since saliva collected by placing a swab underneath the tongue on yields results similar to those from whole saliva collected by passive drool, and because we were interested in assessing both cortisol and alpha-amylase from a population from which passive drool would be difficult to collect, we only used samples of saliva collected via a swab placed under the tongue for our protocol. Given the higher rates of xerostomia 3 in the older adult population and the effect of saliva flow rate on levels of salivary assays it is also important to note the time needed to collect saliva, in order to estimate the flow rate (ml/min) 21 . Multiply assay results (U/ml) by the flow rate in order to express the results as output per unit of time (U/min), to allow for comparison in data analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since saliva collected by placing a swab underneath the tongue on yields results similar to those from whole saliva collected by passive drool, and because we were interested in assessing both cortisol and alpha-amylase from a population from which passive drool would be difficult to collect, we only used samples of saliva collected via a swab placed under the tongue for our protocol. Given the higher rates of xerostomia 3 in the older adult population and the effect of saliva flow rate on levels of salivary assays it is also important to note the time needed to collect saliva, in order to estimate the flow rate (ml/min) 21 . Multiply assay results (U/ml) by the flow rate in order to express the results as output per unit of time (U/min), to allow for comparison in data analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common methods are: suction, fluid synthetic swab, cotton pledget, hydrocellulose microsponge or passive drooling (11). In most of these methods, after collection, salivary flow is measured by weighing the salivary sample in a graded balance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saliva is collected with a substantial amount of bacteria and is produced by more than 20 glands operating at different rates and in different locations, which also can be influenced by diet (Beltzer et al, 2010). Thus, saliva collection requires following specific collection protocol and sample integration methods.…”
Section: Sample Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the apparent simplicity of absorbent devices, they can be affected by the spatial variation of marker concentrations within the mouth, such as in the case of α-amylase proteins (Beltzer et al, 2010), whereas the passive drool technique, although it requires following a more thorough protocol, integrates in the sample contributions from multiple locations.…”
Section: Sample Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%