2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12105-020-01140-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salivary Gland Cancer in the Era of Routine Next-Generation Sequencing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, this fusion corroborates the diagnosis of adenoid-cystic carcinoma although the morphology was largely unusual. The molecular finding is in line with a recently published similar case, however obscuring its origin by illustrating squamous differentiation [61] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, this fusion corroborates the diagnosis of adenoid-cystic carcinoma although the morphology was largely unusual. The molecular finding is in line with a recently published similar case, however obscuring its origin by illustrating squamous differentiation [61] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We envision the SalvGlandDx panel as a useful all-in-one tool to diagnose and classify salivary gland neoplasms. With this panel, we can corroborate the findings from Todorovic et al , who showed the importance of next generation sequencing in salivary gland neoplasms from different aspects [61] . The great advantage is thereby the simultaneous capturing of aberrant expression, gene mutations and fusions with the only need of RNA extraction, also reliably working on FFPE cell block specimen.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These variants are more problematic to diagnose since they mimic other SGN, such as acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC) [52]. Although NGS has improved diagnostic accuracy, the MAML2, FISH, may sometimes exhibit negative results, notably in the oncocytic variants of MEC [61]. Case studies have shown that whenever FISH has failed to express fusion, NGS has validated its potential as a confirmatory test [61].…”
Section: Mucoepidermoid Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromosomal rearrangements and gene fusions are particularly common in salivary gland tumors, and are important elements in the identification of specific cancer subtypes. At the side of traditional diagnostic tools, such as IHC and FISH detection, the next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach has been successfully applied in the recent years to extend and refine our knowledge on salivary gland tumors [ 139 ]. NGS approaches have been used for whole exome, transcriptome, or specific-target sequencing, to generate a precise barcoding of neoplastic samples.…”
Section: Novel Approaches For Modelling Diagnose and Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%