2001
DOI: 10.1159/000327866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salivary Gland Fine Needle Aspiration Using the ThinPrep® Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Al-Khafaji and Afify [5] reviewed a total of 134 salivary gland FNAs, including 74 with surgical follow-up; 50 were processed by TP alone and 24 by CS. They reported that the nondiagnostic rate for TP was double that for CS (16 vs. 8%); 3 cases were falsely classified as negative on TP (2 acinic cell carcinomas and 1 low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma) and 1 case was falsely positive (pleomorphic adenoma diagnosed initially as carcinoma due to the presence of atypical cells without the myxoid stroma).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al-Khafaji and Afify [5] reviewed a total of 134 salivary gland FNAs, including 74 with surgical follow-up; 50 were processed by TP alone and 24 by CS. They reported that the nondiagnostic rate for TP was double that for CS (16 vs. 8%); 3 cases were falsely classified as negative on TP (2 acinic cell carcinomas and 1 low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma) and 1 case was falsely positive (pleomorphic adenoma diagnosed initially as carcinoma due to the presence of atypical cells without the myxoid stroma).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With LBC, the monolayer preparation technique, cells can be stained better because of the absence of obscuring blood elements and air-drying artifacts which are commonly issued in SMEAR [23,24]. Since any blood cells in aspirate are lysed during preparation, excellent diagnostic accuracies have been reported in nongynecologic specimens as well as in uterine cervix [8,9,10,11,25]. Our analysis of parameters determining high cellularity in SMEAR showed that low blood contamination was the only meaningful factor other than the increased number of needle passes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37,60,[73][74][75] Abnormalities of the chromatin pattern, such as chromatin clumping, irregularities of the nuclear membrane and nuclear molding, as well as increased nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio (N:C), loss of cellular orientation and formation of small, 3-D epithelial clusters with marked atypia have been described as major criteria of malignancy (Figure 1). 1,60,[69][70][71] Among these, chromatin clumping seems to be of the greatest predictive value. 1,60 Other features such as increased nuclear size, nuclear pleomorphism, irregular nuclear contours and nuclear grooves or macronucleoli are generally considered of minor significance and not specific enough to establish on their own a positive indication for malignancy diagnosis.…”
Section: Potential Diagnostic Pitfalls Of Brush Cytologymentioning
confidence: 99%