1999
DOI: 10.7557/2.19.1.289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salivary glands in Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus) and in Norwegian reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus)

Abstract:

The aim of this investigation was to compare the size of salivaty glands in Svalbard reindeer {Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus) and in Norwegian reindeer (Rangifer t. tarandus) in relation to feeding strategy, season and reproductive status. The mean body mass (BM, standard deviation j) in adult non-lactating female Svalbard reindeer was 72.0, s = 4.2, kg (n = 8) in September and 46.7, s = 7.1, kg (« = 4) in April. The mean BM of adult non-lactating Norwegian reindeer was 67.5, s = 7.7, kg (» = … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The omasal volume and papillary height to body mass ratios did not increase significantly in adult goats showing that this organ might have reached its maximum size before the age. The omasum has been studied in exotic cattle, sheep, goats (Yamamoto et al 1994;Green and Baker 1996;Lentle et al 1998), Zambian game species (Stafford and Stafford 1993), Norwegian Artic Svalbard reindeer (Mathiesen et al 2000), Czechs deer species (Kamler 2001) and free -ranging moose and muskoxen (Clauss et al 2006). The histomorphology of adult omasum was similar with that of the neonates though the height and width of the papillae significantly increased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The omasal volume and papillary height to body mass ratios did not increase significantly in adult goats showing that this organ might have reached its maximum size before the age. The omasum has been studied in exotic cattle, sheep, goats (Yamamoto et al 1994;Green and Baker 1996;Lentle et al 1998), Zambian game species (Stafford and Stafford 1993), Norwegian Artic Svalbard reindeer (Mathiesen et al 2000), Czechs deer species (Kamler 2001) and free -ranging moose and muskoxen (Clauss et al 2006). The histomorphology of adult omasum was similar with that of the neonates though the height and width of the papillae significantly increased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…They are less numerous in sheep and goats as compared to cattle (Habel 1975). Omasal papillae vary in shape and size amongst breeds and species like cattle, sheep, goats, deer, free -ranging moose and muskoxen (Stafford and Stafford 1993;Yamamoto et al 1994;Green and Baker 1996;Lentle et al 1998;Mathiesen et al 2000;Kamler 2001;Clauss et al 2006). There is a gradual decrease in size of papillae from the reticulo-omasal to the omaso-abomasal orifice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hofmann and Nygren (1992) observed that the relative parotid weight of moose (Alces alces) could be as low as the range usually reported for grazers in the wintertime but increased to twice those values in the summer-a range never reached by grazers. Differences in parotid gland size of a lesser scope, in relation to feeding, habitat, or season, were also observed by Kay (1987) in red deer (Cervus elaphus), Mathiesen et al (1999) in reindeer (Rangifer tarandus), and Jiang et al (2003) in Mongolian gazelles (Procapra gutturosa); in contrast, Hofmann et al (1988) did not find a difference in the mass of the Gl. parotis between two roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) populations from different habitats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Additional data were available for the lesser Malaysian mousedeer (Tragulus javanicus) (Vidyadaran et al, 1994), European bison (Bison bonasus) (Cegielka and Kobrynczuk, 1997), for reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) (Mathiesen et al, 1999), Himalayan tahr (Hemitragus jemlahicus) (Clauss et al, 2005b), and for the okapi (Okapia johnstoni) (Clauss et al, 2006c). BM was either measured directly before dissection of the animals, or was approximated using the bilateral masseter mass as a substitute measure according to Axmacher and Hofmann (1988).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anatomical measurements were either taken from existing publications (Bonin, Tremblay, & Côté, ; Booyse & Dehority, ; Church, ; Clauss, Hofmann, Hummel, et al, ; Clauss, Hummel, Vercammen, & Streich, ; Clauss, Hummel, Völlm, Lorenz, & Hofmann, ; Clauss, Reese, & Eulenberger, ; Geiger, Hofmann, & König, ; Hofmann, ; Hofmann, Geiger, & König, ; Hofmann, Knight, & Skinner, ; Holand & Staaland, ; Holtenius & Björnhag, ; Jerbi, Bayoudh, Clauss, & Pérez, ; Jerbi & Pérez, ; Jiang et al, ; Lauwers, ; Ledger & Smith, ; Li, Yuan, & Zhou, ; Mathiesen et al, ; McSweeney, ; Nagy & Regelin, ; Pérez, Erdogan, & Ungerfeld, ; Pérez & Ungerfeld, ; Pérez & Vazquez, ; Pfeiffer, ; Reissig, ; Sauer et al, ; Sauer et al, ; Sauer, Bertelsen, Lund, Weisbjerg, & Clauss, ; Sibbald & Milne, ; Staaland, Adamczewski, & Gunn, ; Stafford & Stafford, ; Tahas et al, ; Takatsuki, ; Werner, ), or from previously unpublished observations during dissections performed by both senior authors. The data are given in the electronic Supporting Information.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%