2020
DOI: 10.1128/aem.00097-20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli in Wheat Flour: Detection and Serotyping by a Quasimetagenomic Approach Assisted by Magnetic Capture, Multiple-Displacement Amplification, and Real-Time Sequencing

Abstract: Food safety is a new area for novel applications of metagenomics analysis, which not only can detect and subtype foodborne pathogens in a single workflow but may also produce additional information with in-depth analysis capabilities. In this study, we applied a quasimetagenomic approach by combining short-term enrichment, immunomagnetic separation (IMS), multiple-displacement amplification (MDA), and nanopore sequencing real-time analysis for simultaneous detection of Salmonella and Escherichia coli in wheat … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Up to date, very few studies have been published with regard to the implementation of DNA sequencing as a simultaneous detection and characterization tool for food samples, and even less have performed a detailed evaluation of its analytical performance (Hyeon et al, 2018 ; Forghani et al, 2020 ; Ottesen et al, 2020 ; Azinheiro et al, 2021 ; Commichaux et al, 2021 ; Wagner et al, 2021 ). This may be in part due to the complexity involved in the recovery of the microorganisms to reach an acceptable concentration for the sequencing analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Up to date, very few studies have been published with regard to the implementation of DNA sequencing as a simultaneous detection and characterization tool for food samples, and even less have performed a detailed evaluation of its analytical performance (Hyeon et al, 2018 ; Forghani et al, 2020 ; Ottesen et al, 2020 ; Azinheiro et al, 2021 ; Commichaux et al, 2021 ; Wagner et al, 2021 ). This may be in part due to the complexity involved in the recovery of the microorganisms to reach an acceptable concentration for the sequencing analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques are typically applied to pure microbial cultures in order to typify them and in metagenomic studies to characterize the populations present in the sample (González-Escalona et al, 2019 ; Jagadeesan et al, 2019 ; Chen et al, 2020 ). However, if a laboratory is interested in the direct detection of the microbial pathogens present in a food sample, the workflows must be adapted for this particular application, and it is in this context that major gaps exist, as only a handful of studies have been reported (Katz et al, 2017 ; Forghani et al, 2020 ; Ottesen et al, 2020 ; Townsend et al, 2020 ; Commichaux et al, 2021 ). Most of these studies take advantage of the so-called “quasimetagenomics” approach described by Hyeon et al ( 2018 ), which, in brief, is based on a primary sample enrichment followed by immunomagnetic separation (IMS) to concentrate on one specific pathogen, whole-genome amplification (WGA) to increase its DNA concentration, and finally identification and characterization of the pathogen by DNA sequencing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MinION sequencing resulted in a larger output, allowing the potential applicability to other samples, regardless of the quality of the flow cell (number of pores). The work of Forghani et al (2020) showed that a quasimetagenomics method to the strain level with MinION sequencing can be extended to other strains of STEC and other bacterial pathogens without a problem. However, our study, although only including one serotype, showed the potential of the metagenomics approach for samples presenting a population of several different E. coli strains (including nonpathogenic strains).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They obtained 65 and 70 SNP difference to the WGS isolate reference of the spiked bacteria after 1.5 and 48.5 h of sequencing, respectively (Hyeon et al, 2018). A similar quasimetagenomics method was used to target Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) and Salmonella in contaminated flour samples (Forghani et al, 2020). The method proved successful to cluster (without specifying the SNP differences) the metagenomics-obtained strain to the spiked isolate, for multiple single-spiked strains of each pathogen and also on samples cospiked with one strain of each of the two pathogen species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MDA randomly and massively amplifies single-cell genomic DNA and is compatible with whole genome amplification (WGA) [51,52]. MDA is conducted using modified random hexamer primers, phi29 DNA polymerases (strand-displacing DNA polymerase from bacteriophage Ø29), denatured template DNA, and dNTPs [53].…”
Section: Isothermal Amplification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%