2012
DOI: 10.1029/2011wr010874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salt marsh ecohydrological zonation due to heterogeneous vegetation–groundwater–surface water interactions

Abstract: [1] Vegetation zonation and tidal hydrology are basic attributes of intertidal salt marshes, but specific links among vegetation zonation, plant water use, and spatiotemporally dynamic hydrology have eluded thorough characterization. We developed a quantitative model of an intensively studied salt marsh field site, integrating coupled 2-D surface water and 3-D groundwater flow and zonal plant water use. Comparison of model scenarios with and without heterogeneity in (1) evapotranspiration rates and rooting dep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
112
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
3
112
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many investigations, including field studies and numerical simulations, have been carried out to examine pore water flow in salt marshes under the influence of tides [Moffett et al, 2010;Wilson and Morris, 2012;Wilson and Gardner, 2006;Xin et al, 2010a], evapotranspiration [Boaga et al, 2014;Marani et al, 2006;Ursino et al, 2004], soil properties including stratigraphy [Gardner, 2007;Gardner and Wilson, 2006;Wilson and Morris, 2012;Xin et al, 2009Xin et al, , 2012, inland fresh groundwater input [Gardner et al, 2002;Nuttle and Harvey, 1995], and marsh topography [Gardner, 2005;Moffett et al, 2012;Xin et al, 2013aXin et al, , 2011. While these studies generated important insights into the pore water flow behavior, none of them considered the density effects associated with salinity variations, which commonly exist in surface water and pore water within a marsh system [Cao et al, 2012;Hughes et al, 2012].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many investigations, including field studies and numerical simulations, have been carried out to examine pore water flow in salt marshes under the influence of tides [Moffett et al, 2010;Wilson and Morris, 2012;Wilson and Gardner, 2006;Xin et al, 2010a], evapotranspiration [Boaga et al, 2014;Marani et al, 2006;Ursino et al, 2004], soil properties including stratigraphy [Gardner, 2007;Gardner and Wilson, 2006;Wilson and Morris, 2012;Xin et al, 2009Xin et al, , 2012, inland fresh groundwater input [Gardner et al, 2002;Nuttle and Harvey, 1995], and marsh topography [Gardner, 2005;Moffett et al, 2012;Xin et al, 2013aXin et al, , 2011. While these studies generated important insights into the pore water flow behavior, none of them considered the density effects associated with salinity variations, which commonly exist in surface water and pore water within a marsh system [Cao et al, 2012;Hughes et al, 2012].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, spectral data sources do not provide the topographic information necessary to fully understand morphodynamic processes: although digital elevation models (DEMs) have been successfully generated from habitat maps in the Venice lagoon (Silvestri et al, 2003), additional influences on halophyte distribution such as groundwater circulation (Moffett et al, 2010(Moffett et al, , 2012 can lead to mismatches between topography and habitats (Hladik et al, 2013). These additional influences on habitat distribution prevent the reliable use of spectral data to infer topography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spectral data sources, however, are not sufficient to provide the topographic information necessary to fully understand morphodynamic processes: although Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) have been successfully generated from habitat maps 25 in the Venice lagoon (Silvestri et al, 2003), additional influences on halophyte distribution such as groundwater circulation (Moffett et al, 2010(Moffett et al, , 2012 can lead to mismatches between topography and habitats (Hladik et al, 2013). These additional influences on habitat distribution prevent the reliable use of spectral data to infer topography.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%