Salutogenesis as a framework for child protection: literature review

Taylor, Julie

doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02954.x

Cited by 26 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Reininghaus et al (2007) noted the distinction between generalized resistance resources and specific resistance resources, in a study of stress connected to assault on psychiatric nurses, then rejected the distinction by creating a measure of 'stress resistance resources' composed of self-esteem (a generalized resistance resource), self-confidence (a generalized resistance resource), received clinical supervision (specific resistance resource) and staff support services (specific resistance resource). Taylor (2004) differentiated generalized resistance resources and specific resistance resources in her literature review of salutogenesis as a framework for child protection, but characterised both, without differentiation, as helping people to structure life experiences to reinforce the sense of coherence.…”

Section: Specific Resistance Resourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Handbook of Salutogenesis

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Specific Resistance Resourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Handbook of Salutogenesis

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…El enfoque de resiliencia se enriquece de distintas aproximaciones: El modelo salutogénico de Antonovsky (1996), orientado hacia el bienestar y posibilidades de personas y familias, centra el énfasis no en la enfermedad, sino en la salud y el bienestar, su origen, realce y mantenimiento; la forma en que la percepción de las experiencias de adversidad vividas tiene una influencia positiva en la salud (Taylor, 2004;Lindstrom y Eriksson, 2006;Hernán y Lineros, 2010).…”

Section: Componentesunclassified

Resiliencia familiar: una revisión sobre artículos publicados en español

Bravo

López

2016

Rev. Investig. Psicol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMENEn este artículo se presenta una revisión temática sobre el estado del arte de los artículos de resiliencia familiar publicados en español. Partiendo de los factores de riesgo y protección se transita hacia una definición de resiliencia, así como al surgimiento del constructo. Así mismo, se describen los componentes del enfoque de resiliencia, tales como el modelo salutogénico, el ecológico y la psicología positiva. Se caracteriza a la resiliencia familiar con las aportaciones del enfoque sistémico y la teoría del estrés familiar; así como los principales procesos de resiliencia familiar. Se elaboran argumentos sobre la pertinencia del modelo para el abordaje de diversos fenómenos de actualidad. Se revisan las distintas publicaciones por tipos de estudio: investigaciones cualitativas, cuantitativas y artículos de revisión. Para finalizar, se elaboran conclusiones y recomendaciones emanadas de la revisión temática.Palabras clave: factores de riesgo y protección, resiliencia, resiliencia familiar, procesos de resiliencia familiar. ABSTRACTThe current article presents a thematic review about the state of the art on family resilience articles published in spanish. Starting from the risk and protective factors, it moves toward a definition of resilience, as well as the emergence of the construct. Besides, there are described the components of the resilience approach, such as the salutogenic and ecological models and positive psychology. Family resilience is characterized from the systemic approach and the family stress theory, as well as the main family resilience processes. Is argued on the relevance of the model to approach to topical issues. Various publications are reviewed by types of study: cualitative and cuantitative researches, and review articles. Conclusions and recomendations emanating from the thematic review are presented to finish.

show abstract

“…[53] 1.3 Coping skills as an undergraduate Coping both depends on the unique characteristics of the individual but also reflects into the structure of support, the matrix in which the individual functions, [54,55] and an interaction between the stressor, the environment and the individual's perception/response. Antonovsky [32] and Taylor [56] suggest that stressors are not necessary concrete realities, but are perceptions of reality; social constructs that can therefore be reconstructed. The individual's personal assets qualities and strengths interact positively or negatively with factors reflecting the situation.…”

Section: Stress and Copingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Antonovsky [32] and Taylor [56] both suggest that perception is a significant element in stress coping. McNeil, et al [69] argues that undergraduate students whose coping style predominates as avoidance with possible limited self-efficacy, may reflect in patterns of disordered eating as a distraction and a means of exerting control in stressful situations.…”

Section: Copingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mental illness or mental distress; stigma and concealment in University students - a discussion paper

Power

2015

IJH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This discussion paper addresses the issue of mental distress, sometimes mis-perceived or misinterpreted as mental illness. The focus is on positive psychology. Reflecting in part on a UK-based study with younger University students studying to health related degrees, nursing, midwifery and medicine (N = 12), many of the students were apparently suffering dis-stress with disordered eating at least in part being used as a coping mechanism. However notwithstanding that they were at the end of their first year studies in health, a significant number of the students interpreted their approach to eating as a mental illness. Consequently, many within the study felt stigmatised and were reluctant to acknowledge certainly to the University health care authorities that there was an issue; perceiving both academic and career/professional consequences of mental health labelling. The paper approaches the issue of mental health from a health promoting perspective, reflecting against the theory of salutogenesis and its focus within the three dimensions of comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness as an approach to building resilience and managing stressors to better facilitate a sense of coherence. Complex manifestations of distress and poor coping mechanisms can in some cases be misinterpreted or miss perceived as mental illness. Promoting mental health and reducing the stigma of mental illness or the misperception of mental distress as mental illness, would need to be addressed in order to more effectively outreach certainly to younger University students who might be at risk. The focus should be on how better to promote their sense of coherence.

show abstract

Salutogenesis as a framework for child protection: literature review

Cited by 26 publications

References 41 publications

The Handbook of Salutogenesis

The Handbook of Salutogenesis

Resiliencia familiar: una revisión sobre artículos publicados en español

Mental illness or mental distress; stigma and concealment in University students - a discussion paper

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About