2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41375-020-1005-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salvage second transplantation in relapsed multiple myeloma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The phenomenon has also been observed in other studies; for example, in an EBMT study analyzing outcomes after a third auto-HCT performed following previous tandem auto-HCTs, where patients with a longer interval between first-line auto-HCTs and relapse had superior outcomes [21]. Similar correlations have also been seen in other retrospective studies, e.g., [14,15,25,28,30,32,33].…”
Section: Ossupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The phenomenon has also been observed in other studies; for example, in an EBMT study analyzing outcomes after a third auto-HCT performed following previous tandem auto-HCTs, where patients with a longer interval between first-line auto-HCTs and relapse had superior outcomes [21]. Similar correlations have also been seen in other retrospective studies, e.g., [14,15,25,28,30,32,33].…”
Section: Ossupporting
confidence: 79%
“…It is difficult to speculate, how the efficacy of salvage auto-HCT performed with stem cells remobilized after the previous auto-HCT compares with the efficacy of salvage auto-HCT performed with stem cells harvested before the first-line auto-HCT, especially taking into consideration, that for a significant number of studies the information on the type of stem cells used is lacking [21,[27][28][29][30][31][32]. Nevertheless, median PFS of 17 months and median OS of 51 months in our analysis seem to be within the range reported by others for the salvage auto-HCT [11,15,20,25,29,30], including the recent report by CIBMTR with PFS established at 50% at 1 year and 13% at 3 years (vs 65% at 1 year and 26% at 3 years in our study) [32]. Longer time to relapse was associated with survival benefit in terms of both OS and PFS as shown by uni-and multivariable analysis.…”
Section: Osmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pattern is associated with active disease in focal lesions or at extramedullary sites, while there is no MM infiltration of random bone marrow, and hence MRD negativity in these patients is not a useful prognostic tool [23]. Furthermore, previous studies have shown shorter PFS after initial transplant as a strong, adverse prognostic marker for PFS and OS after salvage ASCT [14,17,28]. Although we did not have data on PFS after initial ASCT available in this cohort, we show that a shorter time frame from initial ASCT to salvage ASCT predicts for worse outcome after salvage ASCT; however, this was only significant for PFS, which may be due to the limited followup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent retrospective data of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) strongly indicated a role of salvage ASCT in the novel agent era with a 1-year PFS of 50% and an OS of 94%. It thereby compares favorably with several other approved regimens using newer agents [29]. Another retrospective study performed by the European Blood and Marrow Transplant group (EBMT), showed a median OS of 7 months after the third ASCT if the relapse-free interval (RFI) was <six months, 13 months if the RFI was between 6 and 18 months, and 27 months if the RFI was ≥18 months [30].…”
Section: Treatment Options For MM Patients In Second or Higher Relapsementioning
confidence: 99%