2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-3043-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salvage surgery for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although studies by Bachar GY et al and Goodwin et al maintain that salvage surgery controls disease long-term [ 30 , 31 ], other sources emphasize that these procedures (especially laryngectomy) are associated with high morbidity rates and poor overall or disease-specific survival [ 32 , 33 ]. Higher rates of complications and impaired quality of life after salvage surgery have the potential to overshadow any theoretical gains [ 7 , 32 , 33 ]. Proper clinical selection of candidate for salvage surgery is therefore paramount.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although studies by Bachar GY et al and Goodwin et al maintain that salvage surgery controls disease long-term [ 30 , 31 ], other sources emphasize that these procedures (especially laryngectomy) are associated with high morbidity rates and poor overall or disease-specific survival [ 32 , 33 ]. Higher rates of complications and impaired quality of life after salvage surgery have the potential to overshadow any theoretical gains [ 7 , 32 , 33 ]. Proper clinical selection of candidate for salvage surgery is therefore paramount.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salvage surgery is considered the most curative intervention for residual or recurrent disease in the aftermath of definitive CRT [ 7 ]. However, given the functional disability that generally results, selecting candidates appropriate for salvage surgery is often difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the MR technique is useful for cases wherein the tumor has an atypical shape, which should be paid attention to ensure a sufficient margin, and cases with an atypical anatomy (eg, anatomical anomaly or postoperative change) because the resection of such tumors needs an atypical dissection line. In addition, the technique is equally helpful for salvage surgery for a recurrent case after initial therapy, such as surgery or radiation, since it is difficult to dissect the tissue and understand the tumor location because of the postoperative adhesion or post irradiation‐fibrosis 12,13 . In summary, the MR technique may help otolaryngology surgeons in cases: (a) wherein the tumor is difficult to locate for surgical approach; (b) with an atypical anatomy or tumor shape; and (c) with a recurrent tumor after initial surgery or radiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La afectación ganglionar cervical metastásica constituye el principal factor pronóstico en estos pacientes; de ahí surge la necesidad de su control durante el tratamiento quimioradioterápico y el seguimiento posterior [2][3][4][5]. La cirugía de rescate se considera la intervención más curativa para la enfermedad residual o recurrente tras la quimiorradioterapia [6,7]; sin embargo, la selección de los pacientes candidatos es a menudo difícil. Además, las indicaciones y los beneficios en cuanto a la supervivencia son todavía anecdóticos por la limitada evidencia.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified