2015
DOI: 10.1177/0272431615581417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Same- and Other-Sex Popularity and Preference During Early Adolescence

Abstract: This study examined the longitudinal and bidirectional relations between same-sex (SS) and other-sex (OS) popularity and preference across one school year. Participants were 271 sixth-grade students who completed peer nomination measures at three time points in their schools. Tests of cross-lagged autoregressive models indicated that SS popularity predicted later OS popularity and vice versa. OS preference predicted later SS preference but not vice versa. Findings highlight the importance of more carefully con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Students nominated up to three same- or cross-gender peers in their grade for each question, by writing down the first and last names of peers. Consistent with prior research on early adolescents, no lists or rosters were provided (e.g., Bowker, Adams, Bowker, Fisher, & Spencer, 2015; Markovic & Bowker, 2017; Stotsky & Bowker, 2018). Nominations for nonparticipants and self-nominations were disregarded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students nominated up to three same- or cross-gender peers in their grade for each question, by writing down the first and last names of peers. Consistent with prior research on early adolescents, no lists or rosters were provided (e.g., Bowker, Adams, Bowker, Fisher, & Spencer, 2015; Markovic & Bowker, 2017; Stotsky & Bowker, 2018). Nominations for nonparticipants and self-nominations were disregarded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were 270 young adolescents (52% boys; M age at Wave 1 = 11.84 years; SD = 0.49) who were participating in a larger longitudinal study examining changes in peer relationships during early adolescence (see Bowker, Adams, Bowker, Fisher, & Spencer, ; Markovic & Bowker, , for additional study information). All students enrolled in Grade 6 in two public middle schools were invited to participate in the study; informed parental consent and adolescent assent was obtained from all participants at the start of the study (consent rate = 70%; 67%, 73% in the two schools; 271/387).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each participant and item (including those peer nominations described below), the number of nominations received was summed, proportionalized, and standardized within each grade (separately by school; Cillessen, ). For all peer nomination items in this study, class lists were not provided (for identical procedure, see Bowker et al, ; Markovic & Bowker, ). Instead, participants wrote the names of their school specific grade‐mates for each item.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monsour, 2002) niż na bezpośrednio uchwyconych faktach (por. Bowker, Adams, Bowker, Fisher i Spencer, 2016).…”
Section: Heterofilia a Status Rówieśniczyunclassified