2005
DOI: 10.1214/ejp.v10-273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample Path Large Deviations Principles for Poisson Shot Noise Processes and Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the LDP for X t,T holds under a weaker condition. To prove this theorem we need Lemma 4.3 below, whose proof can be found in Ganesh, Macci and Torrisi (2005) (see Lemma 2.3 therein).…”
Section: Sample Path Large Deviations In the Topology Of Point-wise Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the LDP for X t,T holds under a weaker condition. To prove this theorem we need Lemma 4.3 below, whose proof can be found in Ganesh, Macci and Torrisi (2005) (see Lemma 2.3 therein).…”
Section: Sample Path Large Deviations In the Topology Of Point-wise Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This follows by the LDP of (εS( · ε )) in D[0, 1] equipped with the topology of uniform convergence (see Ganesh, Macci and Torrisi, 2005, Proposition 3.1), using the same techniques in the proof of Theorem 6.2 of Ganesh, O'Connell and Wischik (2004). …”
Section: Sample Path Large Deviationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we give a Cramér-Lundberg type approximation for ε (u), as ε → 0, and we find a most likely path leading to ruin; moreover we determine an asymptotically efficient law for the simulation of ε (u), as ε → 0. These results are based on sample path large deviations of (X ε (t)) derived by combining the ideas of Freidlin-Wentzell theory (see Freidlin and Wentzell, 1984; see also Dembo and Zeitouni, 1998, section 5.6, page 212) and the sample path large deviations of (S(t)) proved by Ganesh, Macci and Torrisi (2005). As in the work of Asmussen and Nielsen (1995), the results in this paper on the ruin probability, the most likely path leading to ruin and the asymptotic efficient simulation law are presented in terms of local adjustment coefficients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The LDP for (reserve dependent premium with delayed claims) risk process was studied by Ganesh, Massi and Torrisi (2007) [7,8]. They proved the LDP with respect to the uniform topology in the case of superexponential claims i.e., claims for which the moment generating function is finite for every 0   .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%