2021
DOI: 10.1177/1094428120986851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research

Abstract: Systematic review techniques are about to become the “new normal” in reviews of management research. However, there is not yet much advice on how to organize the sample selection process as part of such reviews. This article addresses this void and analyzes this vital part of systematic reviews in more detail. In particular, it offers a critical review of systematic literature reviews published in the Academy of Management Annals and the International Journal of Management Reviews between 2004 and 2018. Based … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
201
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
2
201
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In sum, we searched four databases, namely Business Source Premier, Scopus and PsychInfo accessed via Ebsco host, and then additionally, Web of Science. We chose these databases, because they are among the most often used ones in systematic literature reviews (Aguinis et al, 2020;Hiebl, 2021) as well as to cover literature on people analytics from related disciplines such as Information Systems, Organisational Behaviour or Human Resource Management. Further, we searched the AISEL Electronic Library to also include premier IS conference proceedings that are considered important indicators for emerging trends as well as to include the most recent academic discussions and advancements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sum, we searched four databases, namely Business Source Premier, Scopus and PsychInfo accessed via Ebsco host, and then additionally, Web of Science. We chose these databases, because they are among the most often used ones in systematic literature reviews (Aguinis et al, 2020;Hiebl, 2021) as well as to cover literature on people analytics from related disciplines such as Information Systems, Organisational Behaviour or Human Resource Management. Further, we searched the AISEL Electronic Library to also include premier IS conference proceedings that are considered important indicators for emerging trends as well as to include the most recent academic discussions and advancements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is based on systematic review methods (e.g. Booth et al, 2016;Hiebl, 2021;Massaro et al, 2016;Tranfield et al, 2003). In contrast to traditional reviews, systematic reviews are deemed to reduce the likelihood of bias and contribute to identify a comprehensive body of knowledge about a chosen subject (Booth et al, 2016).…”
Section: Review Methods and Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The planning step of the current research paper mainly outlines the motivation of the review as set out in our introduction. In addition, it includes the definition of the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the research to be covered by the review (Hiebl, 2021;Petticrew & Roberts, 2006). Systematic reviews are rooted in the tradition of evidence-based management (Tranfield et al, 2003).…”
Section: Review Methods and Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Com vistas a aprofundar o conhecimento acerca do campo de estudos sobre liderança, criatividade e inovação no setor público, foi empreendida revisão da literatura que pode ser considerada sistemática devido ao uso de critérios metodológicos estruturados, transparentes e replicáveis (Hiebl, 2021). A realização deste tipo de levantamento deve-se, em grande medida, ao foco deste trabalho, circunscrito a uma realidade relativamente particular, e foi realizada para permitir uma melhor compreensão sobre o conhecimento na interface entre os temas no setor público.…”
Section: Método Da Revisão Sistemática Da Literaturaunclassified