Electron Tomography
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-69008-7_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample Shrinkage and Radiation Damage of Plastic Sections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another technique for cryo-sample preparation is cryo-sectioning in which the high pressure frozen thick specimen is trimmed using a diamond knife. Unfortunately, previous studies have shown that there is considerable variation in section thickness, especially for thin sections (Luther, 2006). Focused ion beam (FIB) milling has gained considerable acceptance in recent years as a precision section preparation method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another technique for cryo-sample preparation is cryo-sectioning in which the high pressure frozen thick specimen is trimmed using a diamond knife. Unfortunately, previous studies have shown that there is considerable variation in section thickness, especially for thin sections (Luther, 2006). Focused ion beam (FIB) milling has gained considerable acceptance in recent years as a precision section preparation method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We tried to restore the original (un-shrunken) dimensions of the section in the tomogram for morphometric accuracy by estimating the amount of shrinkage by means of two independent methods (see Section 2). Both methods indicated that the sections shrank in thickness to 63-64% of the original thickness in the area exposed to the beam, and the resin shrinkage during beam irradiation has been demonstrated to occur predominantly along the beam axis, that is in the thickness of the section (Luther, 2006). Indeed, there was no significant lateral displacement within the sections.…”
Section: Depth Compensated Et Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…High-quality reconstruction results from ET are hampered by several major obstacles: First, tilt angles in ET owing to technical and material characteristics are generally limited to a range within ±70° due to scattering of the primary electron beam. The resulting limitation in tilt and inability to collect high angle projections is often referred to as the missing wedge problem (Frank, 2008); Second, reconstructions are affected by the distortions that result from the imperfect optics of the electron microscope and the sample warping due to radiation exposure damage (Luther, 2006). Additionally, electron micrographs are quite noisy and low contrast, especially under low dose collection conditions or when employing higher electron beam voltage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%