2001
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0258(20010215)20:3<367::aid-sim798>3.0.co;2-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample size calculations for intervention trials in primary care randomizing by primary care group: an empirical illustration from one proposed intervention trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these assumptions, we calculated that 17.4 clinics with 172,680 patients were required for this study. Intracluster correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated using an analysis of variance method proposed by Eldridge, Cryer, Feder, and Underwood (2001) and programmed using S-PLUS software. Conservative (unadjusted) ICCs estimated from pilot data for ask, advise, and assist were 0.22, 0.15, and 0.22, respectively.…”
Section: Sample Size and Randomizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these assumptions, we calculated that 17.4 clinics with 172,680 patients were required for this study. Intracluster correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated using an analysis of variance method proposed by Eldridge, Cryer, Feder, and Underwood (2001) and programmed using S-PLUS software. Conservative (unadjusted) ICCs estimated from pilot data for ask, advise, and assist were 0.22, 0.15, and 0.22, respectively.…”
Section: Sample Size and Randomizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum sample size to detect the expected difference of proportions assuming individual randomization with a level of significance set at 95% (2-sided) and at 80% power was first calculated and adjustment was made by inflating the individually randomized sample size by a factor given by where is the average cluster size (10) and ρ the internal variability that represents how strongly individuals within clusters are related to each other (intracluster correlation (ICC)) [33]. Inflating the individually randomized sample size by this factor counteracts the loss of power due to a clustered design [34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In trials with naturally small clusters, the extent of variation in the outcome between clusters, measured using the ICC, tends to be higher than for naturally large clusters. [21][22][23] In addition, there are usually a large number of potential clusters available, and generally, all eligible cluster members would be invited to take part in both the pilot and main trial. By contrast, for naturally larger clusters, sometimes due to costs or administrative burden only a subset of eligible members may be invited to participate and this may differ between the main trial and the pilot.…”
Section: Overview Of Pilot Studies For Cluster Randomised Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%