2020
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample size estimation: Current practice and considerations for original investigations in MRI technical development studies

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(44 reference statements)
1
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the number of participants included is rather small, considering that there can be interindividual differences in DOMS expression and there may be nonresponders; however, our sample size of 16 is larger than the median sample size of current methodological MR studies. 41 Notably, we performed a high-resolution MRI at follow-up, which confirmed the presence of DOMS as intramuscular edema in every participant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…First, the number of participants included is rather small, considering that there can be interindividual differences in DOMS expression and there may be nonresponders; however, our sample size of 16 is larger than the median sample size of current methodological MR studies. 41 Notably, we performed a high-resolution MRI at follow-up, which confirmed the presence of DOMS as intramuscular edema in every participant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…All of these vFA-EPTI protocols were able to produce high quality whole brain MWF maps, with clear white matter bundles, while achieving significant scan time reduction and/or increased spatial resolution. Only a limited number of subjects have been scanned in this preliminary study to evaluate the performance of the method, and more scans and repeatability tests ( Hanspach et al, 2021 ) will need to be conducted for further validation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work successfully demonstrates the feasibility of the presented motion-correction approach on a typical subject group size for current technical development MR studies. 43 Because the signal intensities were normalized to vitreous humor, relative deviations of the normalized signal intensity could be derived that should correspond to relative concentration deviations. However, for conclusions about the actual improvement in quantitative accuracy in future clinical 23 Na MRI studies, which will also depend on the characteristics of the examined pathology, quantitative measurements including crucial postprocessing steps for concentration determination such as correction of the coil sensitivity 44 and partial volume correction 12 are required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%