2007
DOI: 10.1002/sim.3057
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample size evaluation for a multiply matched case–control study using the score test from a conditional logistic (discrete Cox PH) regression model

Abstract: SummaryThe conditional logistic regression model (Breslow NE. Covariance adjustment of relative-risk estimates in matched studies. Biometrics, 1982; 38:661-672) provides a convenient method for the assessment of qualitative or quantitative covariate effects on risk in a study with matched sets, each containing a possibly different numbers of cases and controls. The conditional logistic likelihood is identical to the stratified Cox proportional hazards model likelihood with an adjustment for ties (Regression mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…35 Statistical power calculations indicated that the sample size is sufficient for detecting a linear dose-response with an OR of 1.05 or greater per 1 mGy increase in cumulative RBM dose with a statistical power of 80% using asymptotic conditional logistic regression. 36 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 Statistical power calculations indicated that the sample size is sufficient for detecting a linear dose-response with an OR of 1.05 or greater per 1 mGy increase in cumulative RBM dose with a statistical power of 80% using asymptotic conditional logistic regression. 36 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effect modification i.e ., difference between subgroups was assessed based on the significance of an interaction term added to a model with the main effects. Statistical power calculations indicated that the material was sufficient for detecting a linear dose‐response with OR of 1.06 or greater per 10 nSv h −1 increase in dose rate with statistical power of 80% …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This “efficiency‐rule” reappears in a sample size formula Lachin () derived for multiply matched nested case‐control data. In the situation of “one case per risk set” Lachin () just adds factor (m+1)/m to the right hand side of the famous formula by Schoenfeld (). However, as shown by Ohneberg et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%