2023
DOI: 10.1097/01.naj.0000995360.84994.3b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample Size Planning in Quantitative Nursing Research

Alexa Colgrove Curtis,
Courtney Keeler

Abstract: Editor's note: This is the 18th article in a series on clinical research by nurses. The series is designed to be used as a resource for nurses to understand the concepts and principles essential to research. Each column will present the concepts that underpin evidence-based practice—from research design to data interpretation. To see all the articles in the series, go to https://links.lww.com/AJN/A204.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the survey contained 57 items. Based on the cross‐sectional study sample size calculation recommendation (Ni et al., 2010), the sample size was calculated according to the number of all items included in the survey multiplied by 10 times. Hence, we should collect 570 (57*10) questionnaires from nurses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the survey contained 57 items. Based on the cross‐sectional study sample size calculation recommendation (Ni et al., 2010), the sample size was calculated according to the number of all items included in the survey multiplied by 10 times. Hence, we should collect 570 (57*10) questionnaires from nurses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we should collect 570 (57*10) questionnaires from nurses. We estimate 20% of the completed surveys as invalid responses (Ni et al., 2010), which led to the minimum sample size required being 713 (570/[1–0.2]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exclusion criteria: (a) combined with severe cardiac, liver and renal dysfunction or other malignant tumours and (b) a history of serious mental illness or a family history of serious mental illness. Ping35 proposed that the sample size should be at least 5–10 times the independent variables. There were 16 variables in this study (13 general information questions, the recurrence risk perception of stroke scale, the PSS scale (PSSS) and the Health Behaviour Scale for patients with stroke (HBS-SP)).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion criteria for the study were individuals who were: (a) aged 18–59 years; (b) diagnosed with ischemic or haemorrhagic stroke; (c) Mandarin speakers without aphasia; (d) capable of signing an informed consent form and willing to cooperate with the survey. Equation N = 4 Uα 2 S 2/ δ 2 was used to calculate the sample size (Ni et al., 2010). S = 0.44 was calculated from the presurvey, the allowable error δ was set to 0.1, and α was set to .05, so N = 4 × 1.96 2 × 0.44 2 /0.1 2 ≈ 297.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%