2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10841-017-9969-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling and comparing odonate assemblages by means of exuviae: statistical and methodological aspects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“… , b, Hardersen et al. ), and it has been shown that even small samples could produce a fairly reliable species list for any given site, given that the sampling is repeated (Bried et al. ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… , b, Hardersen et al. ), and it has been shown that even small samples could produce a fairly reliable species list for any given site, given that the sampling is repeated (Bried et al. ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collections of exuviae on shore, and the collections of larvae with various types of actively deployed nets, are likely to be more productive and time-efficient than collections made with drift nets in most circumstances. However, despite the considerable usefulness of exuviae collections for sampling for gomphids (Corbet, 1999;DuBois, 2015;DuBois & Pratt, 2017;Hardersen, Corezzola, Gheza, Dell'Otto, & La Porta, 2017), exuviae are typically available only for relatively short windows of time. Further, exuviae of coenagrionids are often small, fragile, and challenging to identify.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over half of the spatial variation in both abundance and richness was a function of waterbody, rather than site or location, although this was much stronger in dragonflies than damselflies; abundance of the latter appeared equally distributed between sites, waterbodies and locations. In the context of previous studies of odonates, where there is an ongoing debate over the value of sampling adults compared to exuviae or larvae (Raebel et al 2010;Giuglioano et al 2012;Golfieri et al 2017;Hardersen et al 2017), these results demonstrate that significant variation in odonate abundance and richness occurs at the level of waterbodies, particularly for dragonflies, supporting the inference of Kietzka et al (2017). Thus, adult counts can provide useful information about the quality of those individual waterbodies, although precisely how that measure of quality relates to aspects of odonate biology, such as the ability of species to reproduce successfully, remains unclear (Raebel et al 2010, although see Bried et al 2015;Pattern et al 2019), and more intensive methods may be required for particular species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Giuglioano et al 2012;Berquier et al 2016;Simaika et al 2016). Given their mobility, some have suggested that adults do not necessarily signal that viable populations may be supported at a site, leading to recommendations that the sampling of exuviae is the most effective method for surveying odonates (Raebel et al 2010;Hardersen et al 2017). However, the low detectability of exuviae and the risk of under-estimation of occurrence, has led others to favour the sampling of adults (Bried et al 2012;Giuglioano et al 2012), counts of which have been shown to correlate with exuviae and teneral occurrence, two indicators of locally successful completion of the life-cycle (Bried et al 2015;Pattern et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%