2023
DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2023.2231516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling and recovery of infectious SARS-CoV-2 from high-touch surfaces by sponge stick and macrofoam swab

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Varying concentrations of PSV were first randomly deposited onto the packaging surface for contamination. As shown in Figure A, the swab was immersed in RB and used for swabbing the contaminated surface in horizontal, vertical, and diagonal directions . After sample collection, the swab was soaked in 1 mL of RB at RT for 10 min.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Varying concentrations of PSV were first randomly deposited onto the packaging surface for contamination. As shown in Figure A, the swab was immersed in RB and used for swabbing the contaminated surface in horizontal, vertical, and diagonal directions . After sample collection, the swab was soaked in 1 mL of RB at RT for 10 min.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our sampling method made RNA quantification difficult, and results are presented as copies per extraction instead of copies per surface area. Another limitation for using this data in modelling is that the sampling efficiency for the different materials that were sampled is unknown and likely to vary (Hardison et al, 2023; Jansson et al, 2020). Sampling efficiency is predicted to have a large effect on the amount of SARS-CoV-2 RNA detected on surfaces (Supplementary figure 4) but it is very challenging to determine experimentally due to the high number of variables involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%