2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2017.8206411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling-based coverage motion planning for industrial inspection application with redundant robotic system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a vision-based inspection experiment consisting of a clutter-free environment and 400 potential target points, the computation time was reported to be approximately 3 hours, with the majority of this time consumed by the computation of pose-to-pose motion plans. The authors later extended this work to redundant robotic systems [10], where multiple kinematic solutions exist for each target point. While computation times for this method were not reported, one could expect a computation time several folds greater than their initial work.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a vision-based inspection experiment consisting of a clutter-free environment and 400 potential target points, the computation time was reported to be approximately 3 hours, with the majority of this time consumed by the computation of pose-to-pose motion plans. The authors later extended this work to redundant robotic systems [10], where multiple kinematic solutions exist for each target point. While computation times for this method were not reported, one could expect a computation time several folds greater than their initial work.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So later methods find only a set of viewpoints that satisfies the inspection requirements. Then the trajectory-planning task is usually formulated using variants of the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) [22], [23], [24], [25]. To improve the quality of the solution, some use trajectory optimization [26], [27] while others resample viewpoints [3], [4], or adaptively sample viewpoints [6].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) Path Planning and Optimization with BRKGA: Random Key Genetic Algorithm (RKGA) is a meta-heuristic framework that uses random keys in the chromosome to encode the solution [33]. RKGA has been applied to many combinatorial optimization problems [34], [35], [36]. Using random keys is to add an encoding-decoding process to map the feasible space with complex constraints to an unconstrained one, which reduces the complexity of constraint handling in solving a constrained combinatorial optimization problem.…”
Section: B Planning and Optimizing The Inspection Pathmentioning
confidence: 99%