2019
DOI: 10.1177/0962280219885400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling-based Markov regression model for multistate disease progression: Applications to population-based cancer screening program

Abstract: To develop personalized screening and surveillance strategies, the information required to superimpose state-specific covariates into the multi-step progression of disease natural history often relies on the entire population-based screening data, which are costly and infeasible particularly when a new biomarker is proposed. Following Prentice’s case-cohort concept, a non-standard case-cohort design from a previous study has been adapted for constructing multistate disease natural history with two-stage sampli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For some particular applications, the available detection modes information would be helpful for model validation and sensitivity analysis. 48 Our proposed model leverages an alternative approach which would ignore the detection model information and focus on the modeling of screening test results. Since we have extensive followup, our proposed model can be sufficiently learned from screening test results without detection mode information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some particular applications, the available detection modes information would be helpful for model validation and sensitivity analysis. 48 Our proposed model leverages an alternative approach which would ignore the detection model information and focus on the modeling of screening test results. Since we have extensive followup, our proposed model can be sufficiently learned from screening test results without detection mode information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%