2023
DOI: 10.1002/wics.1608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling constrained continuous probability distributions: A review

Abstract: The problem of sampling constrained continuous distributions has frequently appeared in many machine/statistical learning models. Many Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling methods have been adapted to handle different types of constraints on random variables. Among these methods, Hamilton Monte Carlo (HMC) and the related approaches have shown significant advantages in terms of computational efficiency compared with other counterparts. In this article, we first review HMC and some extended sampling methods… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, based on MCMC algorithms, a direct solution involves discarding samples that violate the constraints, thereby exclusively retaining samples that satisfy the constraints; see, for example, [ 1 , 15 , 16 ]. However, these rejection-type approaches may encounter an excessive number of rejections or an extremely large acceptance rate within some local subspace that satisfies the constraints, which leads to poor mixing and computational inefficiency, especially for complicated constraints and the high dimensional distributions [ 17 , 18 ]. Secondly, some literature draws inspiration from penalty functions in optimization problems and considers the construction of barriers along the boundaries of the constrained domain, effectively constraining the sampling process within the constrained area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, based on MCMC algorithms, a direct solution involves discarding samples that violate the constraints, thereby exclusively retaining samples that satisfy the constraints; see, for example, [ 1 , 15 , 16 ]. However, these rejection-type approaches may encounter an excessive number of rejections or an extremely large acceptance rate within some local subspace that satisfies the constraints, which leads to poor mixing and computational inefficiency, especially for complicated constraints and the high dimensional distributions [ 17 , 18 ]. Secondly, some literature draws inspiration from penalty functions in optimization problems and considers the construction of barriers along the boundaries of the constrained domain, effectively constraining the sampling process within the constrained area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%