2017
DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.1999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling effort and uncertainty in leaf litterfall mass and nutrient flux in northern hardwood forests

Abstract: Abstract. Designs for litterfall sampling can be improved by understanding the sources of uncertainty in litterfall mass and nutrient concentration. We compared the coefficient of variation of leaf litterfall mass and nutrient concentrations (nitrogen, phosphorus, calcium, magnesium, and potassium) at different spatial scales and across years for six northern hardwood species from 23 stands in the White Mountains of New Hampshire, USA. Stands with steeper slopes (P = 0.01), higher elevations (P = 0.05), and mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Spatial distribution maps of all studied litter fractions depict higher spatial variability in a 1-ha plot. Similarly, as litter nutrient fluxes also varied substantially in our study, such variations have also been observed in different forest types at more or less similar or greater spatial scales (Yanai et al 2012;Yang et al 2017). This pattern could be due to the high density of litter traps used in this study for capturing the variability of litterfall across the site in the complex forest structure or due to differences in the canopy above the trap (Zalamea et al 2012;Xia et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Spatial distribution maps of all studied litter fractions depict higher spatial variability in a 1-ha plot. Similarly, as litter nutrient fluxes also varied substantially in our study, such variations have also been observed in different forest types at more or less similar or greater spatial scales (Yanai et al 2012;Yang et al 2017). This pattern could be due to the high density of litter traps used in this study for capturing the variability of litterfall across the site in the complex forest structure or due to differences in the canopy above the trap (Zalamea et al 2012;Xia et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Variation in annual litterfall mass was high at the CP stands. The ratios of the highest to lowest annual litterfall mass and the CVs were higher than those recorded in many studies that have conducted long-term litterfall monitoring (Kouki and Hokkanen 1992;Hennessey et al 1992;Enright 1999;Starr et al 2005;Yanai et al 2012;Yang et al 2017).…”
Section: Interannual Litterfall Variationcontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…In addition, the BR species shed all their litter in winter and did not retain dead litter on trees to enhance the annual litterfall mass in the years with typhoon disturbances. The CVs for interannual litterfall variation at the BR stands at 10% in Table 4 were similar to or even lower than those for BR forests in New Zealand (CV = 20%, Alley et al 1998), the United States (CV = 14%-21%; Adam 2008;Yanai et al 2012;Yang et al 2017), and southern Taiwan (CV = 15%; Chin 2008). The relatively low litterfall variation and uniform annual litterfall mass at the BR stands may indicate that evident growth limitations are absent in Xitou.…”
Section: Interannual Litterfall Variationmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The observation of lower variability in total C and N than exchangeable base cations was reported in a more spatially explicit study including the same 0.1‐ha study plots (Li et al, 2010). Lower spatial variability in total C and N than in base cations was also observed in leaf litter across northern hardwood stands (Yanai et al, 2012; Yang et al, 2017); leaf litter both reflects soil nutrient availability to plants and also contributes plant‐derived nutrients to soils.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%