Development and improvement of warning systems are often done empirically, relying on extensive field testing. As this approach is both costly and time-consuming, there is a need for a more rational and efficient alternative. In a study to explore the options for improvement of a Botrytis warning system in flower bulbs, we applied a computer-based approach to systems design. The approach consisted of the construction and evaluation of modified versions of the warning system using epidemiological knowledge, data sets of recorded and forecast weather and a simulation model of epidemic development and fungicide spray impact. Performance of modified versions was evaluated with regard to fungicide input, efficacy of disease control and sensitivity to the prediction error in weather forecasts. This approach can be more efficient than a purely empirical one, as it enables the designer to limit the number of alternative versions to be field-tested on the basis of explicit performance criteria. It also has the advantage that it provides insight into the potentials for improvement of the warning system.
IntroductionDisease warning or forecasting systems are used to improve the efficiency and efficacy of disease control, by timing fungicide application according to identified need. Often, an empirical approach is taken to the development and improvement of warning systems. Development involves the definition of predictive equations and decision rules, and choosing values for parameters and decision thresholds. These may be based on epidemiological relationships established in controlled experiments or correlations derived from field observations, but they usually also include arbitrary elements, e.g. the choice of an action threshold. Subsequently, the warning system is evaluated in field experiments, commonly over several seasons, and several cycles of modification and field testing may follow before acceptable or improved performance is achieved. In consequence, this empirical approach requires a large research investment and is very time-consuming. Design of warning systems could become more efficient if alternative versions of the warning system could be screened with regard to their performance before field evaluation. Field testing could then be restricted to the most promising alternatives. In a study to explore the options for the improvement of a Botrytis warning system in flower bulbs, we applied such a screening technique in the form of computer-based evaluation. In this paper, we will describe the current weather-based Botrytis warning system and its *Paper presented at the EPPO Conference on Warning Services for Plant Protection, Piacenza (IT), 1999-05-12/14, background, explain the methodology we used, present first results and, finally, discuss various aspects of our approach.