2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling in developmental science: Situations, shortcomings, solutions, and standards

Abstract: Sampling is a key feature of every study in developmental science. Although sampling has far-reaching implications, too little attention is paid to sampling. Here, we describe, discuss, and evaluate four prominent sampling strategies in developmental science: population-based probability sampling, convenience sampling, quota sampling, and homogeneous sampling. We then judge these sampling strategies by five criteria: whether they yield representative and generalizable estimates of a study’s target population, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
348
0
8

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 475 publications
(357 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
348
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the limitations is that because we utilized convenience sampling method, there is possibility that sampling bias was introduced and this may limit the external validity of the study’s results. In comparison to population-based probability sampling, convenience sampling produces estimates that are more generalizable to the sample studied, whereas results produced from population-based sampling could yield more representative estimates of the target population [44]. Furthermore, as a cross-sectional study, significant association between the factors of interest and outcome can be difficult to interpret, and causality cannot be established as correlation does not imply causation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the limitations is that because we utilized convenience sampling method, there is possibility that sampling bias was introduced and this may limit the external validity of the study’s results. In comparison to population-based probability sampling, convenience sampling produces estimates that are more generalizable to the sample studied, whereas results produced from population-based sampling could yield more representative estimates of the target population [44]. Furthermore, as a cross-sectional study, significant association between the factors of interest and outcome can be difficult to interpret, and causality cannot be established as correlation does not imply causation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially the case with regard to the results for fathers in Study 2, who might have been more strongly involved in their child's life than fathers in the general population. The sample of Study 1 was also limited in this regard because it was collected by undergraduate students, a procedure that may have resulted in a relatively homogenous sample of families (Bornstein, Jager, & Putnick, 2013).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resulting estimates are usually moderate but vary somewhat with the domain, measure, method, source, and context as well as the ages of assessment and temporal interval between assessments. This univariate approach constitutes a logical initial step in understanding the ontogeny of child language that precedes studies and analyses of multiple aspects of language investigated simultaneously over longer-terms in larger samples with more diverse characteristics (Bornstein, Jager, & Putnick, 2013). Here we report such an omnibus study of long-term (15 months to 11 years) stability of core language skill in relatively large ( N = 421) skill-stratified samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%