1964
DOI: 10.2307/1401868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling in Space and Time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By adding the time dimension to the deÿnition of the sampled population and to the sampling process, one accommodates the multiplicity issue by sampling in the dimension that created the issue in the ÿrst place, namely time. Although some basic theory for space and time sampling in road transportation studies has been developed [37], little has been done to compare the statistical e cacy of various space and time design adaptations to the problem of sampling mobile population groups.…”
Section: Strategies In Space and Time Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By adding the time dimension to the deÿnition of the sampled population and to the sampling process, one accommodates the multiplicity issue by sampling in the dimension that created the issue in the ÿrst place, namely time. Although some basic theory for space and time sampling in road transportation studies has been developed [37], little has been done to compare the statistical e cacy of various space and time design adaptations to the problem of sampling mobile population groups.…”
Section: Strategies In Space and Time Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the two key papers cited so far, the literature on the theory of cross-classified sampling is very limited. Vos (1964) provides some results for simple random sampling. There is a rather more extensive literature on the special case when the row and columns are ordered, typically in space, but possibly in time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Construction of the matrix P and evaluation of P 21 − 1/15: Table 2 gives the Monte Carlo estimates for the joint selection probabilities obtained with the three sampling algorithms in a design with M = 72, N = 9, n = 2 and an m vector given by (20,22,20,22,14,12,12,12,10). All the z-statistics comparing MCMC and hypergeometric joint selection probabilities are less than 2 in absolute value.…”
Section: Proof Of Proposition 1: Sincementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It selects samples of rows and columns of the population matrix independently and considers only the population units in the rows and the columns that have been selected. This design is considered in Vos [22], Skinner [17], and Juillard et al [13]. This work investigates a two dimensional population matrix where entry (i, j) of the matrix has a single unit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%