1982
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1982.tb05002.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling Methods for Detection of Salmonella in Raw Chicken Carcasses

Abstract: Detection of SaZmoneZlu in thaw water, pericloacal skin and whole carcass rinse samples from naturally contaminated broiler chickens was compared. Of 100 birds tested, 70 were found to contain Salmonellae by the three sampling techniques combined; the median level of contamination was 0.27 salmonellae/lOOg eviscerated carcass weight. Recovery with the whole carcass rinse technique (93%) was significantly greater than that obtained with thaw water (63%) and skin (74%) methods; performance of the latter two meth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher Salmonella prevalence and levels found at PB might be a result of the type of sample collected (carcass rinsate). However, results of previous studies indicate that both rinse and excision sampling methods generate similar and comparable results (12,13,49,51).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The higher Salmonella prevalence and levels found at PB might be a result of the type of sample collected (carcass rinsate). However, results of previous studies indicate that both rinse and excision sampling methods generate similar and comparable results (12,13,49,51).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Each of these analytical units has its advantages and disadvantages, and literature reports conflicting results from studies aimed at evaluating the performance of these different analytical units. [8][9][10] As for sample collection, control programs stipulate that samples have to be obtained on the factory premises soon after pre-chilling. [6][7][8][9][10][11] Nevertheless,Fletcher 5 showed that this is the least recommended moment to collect samples, indicating that it might be the least sensitive place to detect the pathogen since carcasses have just been refrigerated immersed in chlorine solution (CS) under constant stirring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10] As for sample collection, control programs stipulate that samples have to be obtained on the factory premises soon after pre-chilling. [6][7][8][9][10][11] Nevertheless,Fletcher 5 showed that this is the least recommended moment to collect samples, indicating that it might be the least sensitive place to detect the pathogen since carcasses have just been refrigerated immersed in chlorine solution (CS) under constant stirring. Other treatments performed during slaughter, such as successive rinsing of the whole carcass with CS, use of antimicrobial substances, or presence of residual CS in the samples, may all hamper Salmonella detection at this stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These levels correspond to those reported for non‐kosher chickens. D’Aoust et al. (1982) reported that chickens contain on average 1.8 cells of Salmonella per 100 g of skin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%