2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling of secondary margins decreases the need for re-excision after partial mastectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study, residual tumour was identified in 38% cases with tumour at margin, 21% in cases with margins measuring between 0.1 and 0.9 mm and in 14% in cases with margins from 1.0 to 1.9 mm . Confirming this, a number of studies have shown that shaved margins revealed residual tumour in cases with less than 2 mm free margins, but the incidence decreased with 2 mm or more margins . Tables and show data to support the view that wider margins not only decrease local recurrence rate but also decrease incidence of residual tumour tissue after first excision.…”
Section: Studies With a 2‐mm Margin Width As An Optimal Negative Marginmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In another study, residual tumour was identified in 38% cases with tumour at margin, 21% in cases with margins measuring between 0.1 and 0.9 mm and in 14% in cases with margins from 1.0 to 1.9 mm . Confirming this, a number of studies have shown that shaved margins revealed residual tumour in cases with less than 2 mm free margins, but the incidence decreased with 2 mm or more margins . Tables and show data to support the view that wider margins not only decrease local recurrence rate but also decrease incidence of residual tumour tissue after first excision.…”
Section: Studies With a 2‐mm Margin Width As An Optimal Negative Marginmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…19 Confirming this, a number of studies have shown that shaved margins revealed residual tumour in cases with less than 2 mm free margins, but the incidence decreased with 2 mm or more margins. [64][65][66][67][68] Tables 5 and 6 show data to support the view that wider margins not only decrease local recurrence rate but also decrease incidence of residual tumour tissue after first excision.…”
Section: Is 'No Ink On Tumour' Acceptable For Bcs For Dcis?mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Guidroz reported that surgeon assessment of the lumpectomy cavity with selective excision of additional tissue resulted in decreased need for second surgery following primary lumpectomy [22]. Simply employing a systematic removal of six additional shave margins (covering the entire cavity) from lumpectomy cavities halved the incidence of residual disease compared to patients who did not have the additional tissue submitted [23].…”
Section: Effect Of Different Methods Of Margin Procurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Par ailleurs, le recours à l'oncoplastie dans ce contexte (CCIS) pourrait ré duire le risque de reprise en mastectomie avec absence de lé sion ré siduelle sur la piè ce opé ratoire de mastectomie (« mastectomie blanche »). [14] < 2 mm 366 66,7 Wallace et al [27] < 5 mm 8 38 Chagpar et al [28] < 1 mm 109 29 Guidroz et al [29] < 2 mm 299 29,4 Gilleard et al [30] < 2 mm 215 33 Devouge et al [24] < 2 mm 50 56…”
Section: Place Spe´cifique De L'oncoplastie Pour Le Ccisunclassified