2008
DOI: 10.2737/nrs-gtr-22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling protocol, estimation, and analysis procedures for the down woody materials indicator of the FIA program

Abstract: Manuscript

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
137
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
137
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same radius, whenever present, the following microhabitats were recorded: cavity, missing bark (surface 10 × 10 cm), bark pocket, broken stem, broken fork, crack (width 1–5 cm), sap drop, ivy, >20% of dead crown and sporophores of saproxylic fungi – and their density was estimated. In addition, we measured the amount of downed woody debris larger than 2.5 cm in diameter on three 50 m‐long transects, following the Line Intersect Sampling method (Woodall & Williams, ). All types (snags and logs) of deadwood were classified into one of two decay stages based on a ‘knife test’ and remaining bark cover: (i) ‘Fresh’: bark is present, or at least partially present, and usually firmly attached; the knife tip penetrates <1/3 of the diameter, the wood is hard; (ii) ‘Decayed’: moderately to strongly decayed wood, form is still apparent but soft or partly destroyed wood appears, the knife tip penetrates >1/3 the diameter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the same radius, whenever present, the following microhabitats were recorded: cavity, missing bark (surface 10 × 10 cm), bark pocket, broken stem, broken fork, crack (width 1–5 cm), sap drop, ivy, >20% of dead crown and sporophores of saproxylic fungi – and their density was estimated. In addition, we measured the amount of downed woody debris larger than 2.5 cm in diameter on three 50 m‐long transects, following the Line Intersect Sampling method (Woodall & Williams, ). All types (snags and logs) of deadwood were classified into one of two decay stages based on a ‘knife test’ and remaining bark cover: (i) ‘Fresh’: bark is present, or at least partially present, and usually firmly attached; the knife tip penetrates <1/3 of the diameter, the wood is hard; (ii) ‘Decayed’: moderately to strongly decayed wood, form is still apparent but soft or partly destroyed wood appears, the knife tip penetrates >1/3 the diameter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In times of extreme fire weather (e.g., drought), DWM may constitute a fire hazard that should be monitored . Carbon pools, fuels, forest structure, and wildlife habitat can be measured to some degree with estimates of DWM (Woodall 2007, Woodall andMonleon 2008).…”
Section: Down Woody Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coarse and fine woody materials (CWM and FWM, respectively) were sampled on 7.32‐m horizontal distance transects radiating from each FIA subplot center at 30, 150, and 270 degrees (Woodall & Williams 2005). FWM (1‐, 10‐, and 100‐h fuels) were sampled on the 150‐degree transect on each subplot (Burgan 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Down woody material carbon and biomass estimation .— Line intersect estimation model‐based estimators were used to determine volume and biomass of DWM for each inventory plot (Van Wagner 1964, Brown 1974, De Vries 1986). CWM and FWM carbon (C) content was estimated using a combination of line‐intersect biomass per unit area estimators and C content conversion factors (Woodall & Williams 2005). Carbon content was then determined by multiplying mass estimates by a conversion factor (Birdsey 1992, Waddell 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation