2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-016-2625-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling Quantum Nonlocal Correlations with High Probability

Abstract: It is well known that quantum correlations for bipartite dichotomic measurements are those of the form γ = ( u i , v j ) n i,j=1 , where the vectors u i and v j are in the unit ball of a real Hilbert space. In this work we study the probability of the nonlocal nature of these correlations as a function of α = m n , where the previous vectors are sampled according to the Haar measure in the unit sphere of R m . In particular, we prove the existence of an α 0 > 0 such that if α ≤ α 0 , γ is nonlocal with probabi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, given an entangled state it is very likely that one can prove its nonclassicality on a first try by choosing random observables (note also related recent results in Ref. [29]). This is to be contrasted with the original demonstration [27,28], involving two qubits, where the settings have to be carefully selected.…”
Section: All Typical States Of Five or More Qubits Violate Local Realmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, given an entangled state it is very likely that one can prove its nonclassicality on a first try by choosing random observables (note also related recent results in Ref. [29]). This is to be contrasted with the original demonstration [27,28], involving two qubits, where the settings have to be carefully selected.…”
Section: All Typical States Of Five or More Qubits Violate Local Realmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [24] the same problem was considered from the correlation matrices point of view. That is, if one picks a quantum correlation matrix at random, which is the probability that it is nonlocal?…”
Section: Bipartite Correlation Bell Inequalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that this is exactly the same as sampling independent normalized m-dimensional real gaussian vectors. It is very easy to see that if one fixes any finite m, the probability that a quantum correlation matrix sampled according to the previous procedure is nonlocal tends to one as N tends to infinity (see [24,Section 2] for details). However, this kind of sampling does not say too much since the set of quantum correlation matrices of order N which can be obtained with a fixed m is very small.…”
Section: Bipartite Correlation Bell Inequalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precise statement we will use is the following. A proof for it can be seen in [11], Proposition 1.5. Lemma 1.2.…”
Section: Correlation Matrices and Tensor Normsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…One of the first steps in this direction was given in [3], where the authors study the dual question, that is: how likely is it for a random (in a certain sense) Bell inequality to attain a strictly higher value on quantum correlations than on classical correlations? Later, in [11], some of the authors of this note initiated the study of random correlations in the particular case where these correlations arise as the product of two rectangular normalized Gaussian matrices, a setting motivated by a well known result of Tsirelson that we explain below. These results, among others, are summarized in greater depth in the survey paper [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%