“…In our case studies, SRS and cLHS were equivalent in terms of map accuracy. Several studies (e.g., Castro‐Franco, Costa, Peralta, & Aparicio, 2015; Chu, Lin, Jang, & Chang, 2010; Contreras, Ballari, De Bruin, & Samaniego, 2019; Domenech, Castro‐Franco, Costa, & Amiotti, 2017; Schmidt et al, 2014) concluded that cLHS in combination with kriging or random forest for mapping gave the most accurate prediction. These studies promote the use of cLHS as an effective sampling design for mapping.…”