2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.79.084025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Samurai project: Verifying the consistency of black-hole-binary waveforms for gravitational-wave detection

Abstract: We quantify the consistency of numerical-relativity black-hole-binary waveforms for use in gravitational-wave (GW) searches with current and planned ground-based detectors. We compare previously published results for the ð' ¼ 2; jmj ¼ 2Þ mode of the gravitational waves from an equalmass nonspinning binary, calculated by five numerical codes. We focus on the 1000M (about six orbits, or 12 GW cycles) before the peak of the GW amplitude and the subsequent ringdown. We find that the phase and amplitude agree withi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
87
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 181 publications
(225 reference statements)
7
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This code also supplies the total ADM energy M ADM of the system, as well as the individual "puncture ADM masses" M ADM,i , to very high precision. We note, however, that for highly spinning or boosted Bowen-Yorktype data, a measurable amount of radiation energy may be included in these puncture ADM masses, but then escape to infinity [8,[40][41][42]; thus the initial puncture ADM mass may not be the optimal measure of premerger black-hole mass. These quantities are also listed in Table I.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This code also supplies the total ADM energy M ADM of the system, as well as the individual "puncture ADM masses" M ADM,i , to very high precision. We note, however, that for highly spinning or boosted Bowen-Yorktype data, a measurable amount of radiation energy may be included in these puncture ADM masses, but then escape to infinity [8,[40][41][42]; thus the initial puncture ADM mass may not be the optimal measure of premerger black-hole mass. These quantities are also listed in Table I.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strongest radiation is produced just as the two black holes join to become one, and can only be fully understood through explicit numerical simulations. Since the first stable evolutions of black-hole-binary mergers [2][3][4][5], and after it was established that the gravitational waveforms from these evolutions were universal, and consistent across codes and methodologies [6][7][8], researchers have turned their attention to how the results of numerical relativity can most usefully be supplied to the gravitational-wave data-analysis community.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantities T ℓm , δ ℓm , ρ ℓm , ρ J ℓm can be read from Eqs. (19), (20), (23), (25), (C1), (C4) and (C6) in Ref. [17], respectively.…”
Section: −1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]), we can compare in detail the EOB predictions with numerical results, and when necessary, introduce new features into the EOB model in order to improve its agreement with the numerical results. This is an important avenue to LIGO, GEO and Virgo template construction, as eventually thousands of waveform templates may be needed to detect the GW signal within the detector noise, and to extract astrophysical information from the observed waveform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These detectors are primarily sensitive to the oscillatory components of the GW signal, as most of the signal power lies in the lowest-order oscillatory modes of the radiation (for nearly circular orbits). More recently, successes in numerical relativity (NR) [45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59] have necessitated the need for accurate PN waveforms to compare with the results of binary black-hole (BH) merger simulations [60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,5 This statement is only true for standard choices of the polarization triad (see Sec. II A).…”
Section: A What Is Gravitational-wave Memory?mentioning
confidence: 99%