Sanctioning Iran

Alam, Aftab

doi:10.1177/097492841006700103

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Untuk itu jika ditinjau kuantitasnya, AS memiliki reputasi 'terbaik' dibandingkan negara-negara lain. Namun jika ditinjau kualitasnya-yaitu dengan melihat hasil, kredibilitas dan efektifitasnya-dari sudut pandang Iran reputasi AS terbilang kurang kredibel karena mayoritas sanksi itu tidak berhasil dalam mewujudkan tujuan utama AS (Alam, 2011 Sebagai bahan refleksi penulis, diplomasi koersif seharusnya diadopsi oleh suatu negara untuk menjadi alternatif dari kemungkinan diadopsinya opsi perang. Di dalam kasus ini, penulis melihat bahwa strategi diplomasi koersif yang diterapkan oleh AS sejatinya tidak ditujukan untuk membuka peluang negosiasi dengan pemerintahan Iran saat ini, melainkan untuk menghendaki perubahan secara struktural di pemerintahan Iran itu sendiri melalui regime change.…”

Section: Reputasi As Sebagai Negara Pengancamunclassified

Post JCPOA

Rahim¹

2019

Jurnal ICMES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper analyzes the effectiveness of U.S.’ coercive diplomacy policy towards Iran carried out through the (re)implementation of sanctions regime after its withdrawal from the so called multilateral agreement ‘JCPOA’ on 8 May 2018. Unsatisfied with the terms of the Agreement, the U.S. administration decided to pull out from the Agreement and immediately implemented sanctions regime against Tehran. Despite the significance of previous studies regarding U.S.’ implementation of sanctions against Iran, I did not found any study that used a specific theory to indicate factors or conditions favoring the success of U.S. sanctions against Iran. In particular, I did not found any literature that analyzes the effectiveness U.S.’ sanctions against Iran after its withdrawal from JCPOA using a specific theory. This paper will fill that gap in the literature by examining the case study using a theory-driven research. The Analytical framework that I apply in this paper is coercive diplomacy theory developed by Tom Sauer which I elaborate into five main variables: objective, demand, threat, time-pressure, and motivation. By examining those factors, this paper argues that U.S.’ coercive diplomacy policy against Iran has been ineffective because of the lack of U.S.’ calculation and considerations to the five variables.This paper analyzes the effectiveness of U.S.’ coercive diplomacy policy towards Iran carried out through the (re)implementation of sanctions regime after its withdrawal from the so called multilateral agreement ‘JCPOA’ on 8 May 2018. Unsatisfied with the terms of the Agreement, the U.S. administration decided to pull out from the Agreement and immediately implemented sanctions regime against Tehran. Despite the significance of previous studies regarding U.S.’ implementation of sanctions against Iran, I did not found any study that used a specific theory to indicate factors or conditions favoring the success of U.S. sanctions against Iran. In particular, I did not found any literature that analyzes the effectiveness U.S.’ sanctions against Iran after its withdrawal from JCPOA using a specific theory. This paper will fill that gap in the literature by examining the case study using a theory-driven research. The Analytical framework that I apply in this paper is coercive diplomacy theory developed by Tom Sauer which I elaborate into five main variables: objective, demand, threat, time-pressure, and motivation. By examining those factors, this paper argues that U.S.’ coercive diplomacy policy against Iran has been ineffective because of the lack of U.S.’ calculation and considerations to the five variables.

show abstract

Section: Reputasi As Sebagai Negara Pengancamunclassified

Post JCPOA

Rahim¹

2019

Jurnal ICMES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Iranian Nuclear Impasse: The Protracted Imbroglio

Dasgupta¹

2018

Jadavpur Journal of International Relations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Iranian nuclear deadlock has been one of the most contentious issues confronting the international community till date. The following article seeks to trace the tussle between the evolution of the Iranian nuclear aspirations and the politics of non-proliferation. It is divided into four main sections. The first section attempts to give a brief description of the problematic of the discriminatory politics of nuclear non-proliferation regime that Iran has been put through by the West. Iran’s nuclear aspirations can be traced back to the 1950s. Its strategic relations with the USA and leading European nations brought Iran significant scientific and technological assistance to set up a nuclear infrastructure. The second segment of the article delves into Iran’s nuclear activities during the Shah regime and the Western response. The post-Shah years brought about notable changes in the Western approach to Iran’s nuclear pursuit, the denial of nuclear technology to Iran being the predominant stand of the West especially the USA. The third section addresses the changes in Iran’s stand on the nuclear issue and the consequent changes in its relations with the West especially the USA. The last section of the article, that is, the concluding part attempts a dispassionate take on the rationale behind its nuclear aspirations, the veracity of its arguments and the future of the Iranian nuclear impasse.

show abstract

Sanctioning Iran

Cited by 2 publications

References 11 publications

Post JCPOA

Post JCPOA

The Iranian Nuclear Impasse: The Protracted Imbroglio

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About