Cretan Sanctuaries and Cults 2005
DOI: 10.1163/9789047406907_004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sanctuaries and Cults of the Late Minoan Iiic-Subminoan Period

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kotsonas 2008, 283). It is unclear whether this intention relates to the roughly contemporary fieldwork of the French School in Anavlochos (1929) and Dreros (1932–6), both located north-east of Lyktos (Prent 2005, 281, 284–5). However, Arthur Maurice Woodward, then Director of the School, explained in letters to Evans and Humfry Payne that the ideal site would be a sanctuary with rich offerings which would contribute to the identification of the Cretan or Spartan origins of some classes of finds recovered in the School's excavations in Laconian sanctuaries 89 .…”
Section: The Twilight Of International Interest In the Interwar Periomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kotsonas 2008, 283). It is unclear whether this intention relates to the roughly contemporary fieldwork of the French School in Anavlochos (1929) and Dreros (1932–6), both located north-east of Lyktos (Prent 2005, 281, 284–5). However, Arthur Maurice Woodward, then Director of the School, explained in letters to Evans and Humfry Payne that the ideal site would be a sanctuary with rich offerings which would contribute to the identification of the Cretan or Spartan origins of some classes of finds recovered in the School's excavations in Laconian sanctuaries 89 .…”
Section: The Twilight Of International Interest In the Interwar Periomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like the probable dining buildings, they are of essentially axial form (though exact plan varies), and usually set slightly apart from the rest of the built zone, with a large space suitable for public gatherings adjacent to them. Here, a large flat-bottomed hollow just downslope to the southeast would fulfil this function admirably (Day 2009b; Eliopoulos 2001; 2004; Gesell, Day and Coulson 1988, 289–90; Gesell, Glowacki and Klein forthcoming; Klein and Glowacki 2009; Pendlebury et al 1937–8, 75–6; Prent 2005, 126–54, 188–200; Rutkowski 1986; Tsipopoulou 2001; 2009). Cult buildings also have concentrations of specialised equipment setting them apart from domestic cult areas, including, particularly, large wheelmade female figurines, plaques and tubular stands (Day et al 2006; Day 2009b; Gesell 1985, 47–58; Tsipopoulou 2009).…”
Section: Building A1 (Figs 2–6)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At Aphrati, in central Crete, the inscribed pieces of bronze weaponry discovered, dating from the late 7th and early 6th centuries bc , have been interpreted both as votive spoils, by Perlman, and as records of personal victories ( Supplementum Epigraphicum Graecum 52 [2002], 829–842; Perlman 2002, 219–21, nos. 8–21; see also Prent 2005, 385–6, Erickson 2002, 75–6 and Hoffmann 1972, 2–16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“… 3 A paucity of weaponry is especially apparent if set against the more frequent discoveries of Archaic armoury on the island, thereby marking a clear deviation from the preceding traditions when body armour and weaponry were deposited, not just in sanctuaries on the island, but in a variety of burial contexts such as the North Cemetery at Knossos (Prent 2005, 384; Coldstream and Catling 1997; Snodgrass 1996, 577–85). At Aphrati, in central Crete, the inscribed pieces of bronze weaponry discovered, dating from the late 7th and early 6th centuries bc , have been interpreted both as votive spoils, by Perlman, and as records of personal victories ( Supplementum Epigraphicum Graecum 52 [2002], 829–842; Perlman 2002, 219–21, nos.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%