1999
DOI: 10.1093/japr/8.3.345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sand as Litter for Rearing Broiler Chickens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
14
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the carcass yield, yield of valuable carcass parts and share of abdominal fat, which ranged from 1.02 to 1.24%, the influence of the material used for the litter was not confirmed, which is in accordance with the results of Bilgili et al (1999), Toghyani et al (2010.Established significant effect on the yield of thigh meat does indicate the importance of the choice of material for the litter, and its quality, in terms of moisture content, drying capability, skinning or tendency to form clumps, for physical activity of chicken and the development leg muscle tissue.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the carcass yield, yield of valuable carcass parts and share of abdominal fat, which ranged from 1.02 to 1.24%, the influence of the material used for the litter was not confirmed, which is in accordance with the results of Bilgili et al (1999), Toghyani et al (2010.Established significant effect on the yield of thigh meat does indicate the importance of the choice of material for the litter, and its quality, in terms of moisture content, drying capability, skinning or tendency to form clumps, for physical activity of chicken and the development leg muscle tissue.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Inconsistency of research results may be due to the diversity of alternative materials studied that are used for litter. Bilgili et al (1999) suggest that the difference in body weight may be due to reduced feed intake in treatments with sawdust, as a consequence of consuming parts of the litter, which is not the case if the sand is used. Based on the tested materials which are the most commonly used materials for the litter, the effect on production performance of broilers did not occur.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Hess et al, 1996). Bilgili et al (1999) reported successfully rearing several broiler flocks on sand in comparison with pine shaving in a research setting. They noted that male broilers were 30 to 40 points heavier with no differences in female weight.…”
Section: Earth Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In poultry production, attempts have been made to use and test several types of material for litter: refined gypsum (Wyatt & Goodman, 1992;Grimes et al, 2006), recycled paper chips from waste newspapers (Lien et al, 1992), pelletized newspaper (Frame et al, 2002;Grimes et al, 2006), tree core-like kenaf core (Malone et al, 1990;Brake et al, 1993), particleboard residues (Hester et al, 1997), leaves (Willis et al, 1997), sand (Bilgili et al, 1999;Arnould et al, 2004), cotton waste (Grimes et al, 2006), hazelnut husks or wheat stalks (Sarica & Cam, 2000), wood shavings (Shields et al, 2005;Macklin et al, 2005), rice hulls (Swain & Sundaram, 2000;Shields et al, 2004), rice hull ashes (Chamblee et al, 2003), coffee husk (Ortiz et al, 2003;Ortiz et al, 2006), saw dust (Mendes et al, 2011), coir dust (Swain & Sundaram, 2000), straw (Al Homidan & Robertson,2003), feathers (Sanotra et al, 1995;Gunnarson et al, 2000), sugarcane bagasse or peat (Petherick & Duncan, 1989). The use of any of these substrates most often depends on the availability in each area and at each moment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%