1996
DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.153.6.0881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sand body orientation, palaeoslope analysis and basin-fill implications in the Westphalian A–C of Great Britain

Abstract: Channel orientation and palaeoflow analyses across the British Westphalian (Carboniferous) coalfields show that three main inflow directions dominated the palaeogeography from the mid-Langsettian to the mid-Bolsovian. In eastern Scotland and NE England, flow was mainly from the N and NE. In the Pennine Basin of north central England, flow was mainly from the W and NW, whilst in South Wales, main flow from the SW was compatible with a westerly system that also branched to give the northerly inflows recorded in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a thick succession of younger Carboniferous sediments occurs in the basins of northern England and they display an intriguing change in sediment provenance in the immediate post-Namurian interval. Much of the Namurian in®ll of the region was derived from terranes to the north-east, but in the Westphalian the principal sediment supply switched to the west (Rippon, 1996). The Sr±Nd signature of the new source material suggests a young crustal source probably associated with a developing orogenic front (Glover et al, 1996).…”
Section: Regional Carboniferous Basin Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a thick succession of younger Carboniferous sediments occurs in the basins of northern England and they display an intriguing change in sediment provenance in the immediate post-Namurian interval. Much of the Namurian in®ll of the region was derived from terranes to the north-east, but in the Westphalian the principal sediment supply switched to the west (Rippon, 1996). The Sr±Nd signature of the new source material suggests a young crustal source probably associated with a developing orogenic front (Glover et al, 1996).…”
Section: Regional Carboniferous Basin Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of ultramafic rocks to the west that are potential sources of the chrome spinel bearing detritus. Small local sources, such as the Mona Complex of Anglesey, are considered unlikely to have been the main suppliers of chrome spinel because of the large size and scale of the Westphalian river systems involved (Rippon, 1996). Furthermore, zircon age data rule out significant contributions from the Mona Complex, since the westerly derived detritus lacks late Precambrian to early Cambrian zircons that would be associated with derivation from this complex .…”
Section: Identifying Mineralogically Distinct and Geographically Sepamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the UK, Westphalian Coal Measures cleat formation is thought to be primarily controlled by tectonism following uplift and release of overburden pressure (Rippon, 1996). Thus, pyrite-coating cleat surfaces post-dates cleat formation and coalification.…”
Section: Post-depositional Addition Of Sulphur To Coalmentioning
confidence: 99%